Wednesday, June 18, 2025

China Auto Industry On Verge Of Collapse As Six Major Cities Run Out Of Car-Buying Subsidies

  Difficult not to recognize a perfect bubble bursting in China right now exactly in line with what happened in Japan in the 1990s. 

  The rule is that you cannot reflate an economy out of such a bubble for the simple reason that the assets are not worth their book value. So whatever money is pumped in the economy is sunk in a barrel of the Danaids, i.e. a hole without bottom where large, indebted companies are just paying interests to stay afloat, while the rest of the economy, usually smaller, more dynamic companies are starved of financing and cannot grow. On this path, in a few years, China will be a shadow of what it is now, as like Japan it will have shrunk its productive capacity and exploded the debt. The state will double down on useless projects, as it happened in Japan, maintaining the illusion of growth for a while. But then you have to pay to sustain all these outsized investments. This is how, small villages in Japan ended up with international swimming pools which were closed a few years later as the upkeep was far too high. Or likewise in Greece, the nonsensical Olympic Games investments of 2000 burdened the economy for decades. 

 Sunk investments also play a role. China has built the capacity to pour billions of tons of concrete and extend thousands of kilometers of express train lines. Does it mean that every village should have a rapid train service for high-rise buildings? But if no one lives there, who's gonna buy the tickets and who's gonna pay back the debt, and the interests piling up?

 Japan didn't find the solution to the problem and in 30 years saw the size of its economy divided by four! The real estate bubble in China exploded in 2016, so we are closing on 10 years. The growth rates published by the country of over 5% a year since are fanciful and do not represent real growth, except for the debt. We can confirm this fact by the huge deflation wave currently sweeping over the country, reflected below in car manufacturing.  

 With trade tensions rising, again as happened for Japan in the late 1980s, another headwind will start blowing. So less productive investments, less trade and an older population, somehow China will have to find an unlikely way to become far more productive. But how do you do that if credit is just enough to pay back accumulated debt? Hopefully DeepSeek"s R1 is hard at work looking for this unlikely solution!

China Auto Industry On Verge Of Collapse As Six Major Cities Run Out Of Car-Buying Subsidies

China auto industry was already on the rocks.

Recall, in late May we reported that a historic price war had broken out in China, one where the world's largest maker of EVs, BYD, had just cut prices by 34% in a desperate attempt to capture market share and put its competitors out of business (while unleashing a deflationary global shockwave that would crush EV makers around the globe).

Just a few days later, Wei Jianjun, Chairman of Great Wall Motor - one of China's largest car makers - said China's auto industry was going through its own "Evergrande" moment as a result of the unprecedented price war (for those who missed that particular episode, Evergrande is effectively China's Lehman, because while the largest financial asset in the US is capital markets in China it is real estate, and the 2021 collapse of Evergrande has left China's property market shocked and still unable to recover).

And also roughly at the same time, we reported that China's Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (or CATL), the world's largest EV battery maker (and thus directly dependent on the viability and growth of the global EV industry), was receiving more in Chinese subsidies in 6 months than Chinese auto giants BYD, Great Wall and SAIC combined. 

All in order to maintain the illusion that China's EV industry was firing on all cylinders, to use a bad metaphor, and more importantly, to give the impression that China's economy was booming at a time when all eyes were on it as a result of the trade war with America (because woe to the loser).

The problem, as every Potemkin village comes to realize sooner or later, is that one can only pretend for so long and eventually the stimulus money runs out. And in the case of China, the stimmies have almost run out. 

According to Reuters, at least six cities and municipalities across China have suspended trade-in subsidies for car buyers in June, which could grind to a halt most if not all new car sales in the world's second-biggest economy.

Notices from governments in Zhengzhou and Luoyang blamed the subsidy pause on the first round of funding allocated by Beijing for the program running out, while Shenyang and Chongqing said the suspension was due to adjustments to improve capital efficiency. The northwestern region of Xinjiang issued a similar suspension.

Cars for export sitting at a port in Nanjing, Jiangsu province, China June 9, 2025. photo Reuters.

Translation: Beijing was pushing the communist economy into overdrive with the help of billions in stimmies to create the impression in April and May that all is well and that Trump's trade war isn't hurting China. But now, the money has run out. 

As Reuters reports, China's government has leaned on subsidies for big-ticket items, including cars, home appliances and some electronics to get people spending as consumer sentiment in the country remains sluggish amid a prolonged property slump and concerns over wage growth and unemployment.

Naturally, the programmes - also known as free money - have been embraced with some enthusiasm, and as of May 31, there were more than 4 million applications submitted this year for car-specific trade-in subsidies, according to the country's Ministry of Commerce. Not surprisingly then that boosted by the torrential stimulus, Chinese retail sales data for May released earlier this week surprised on the upside... but economists quickly realized that subsidies were the main reason for the higher-than-expected 6.4% growth.

There is yet hope that the stimmies running out won't crater ground zero of China's deflationary exports, the EV industry: and that is even more stimmies! While there was no official announcement about when more funds from the central government will be released for programmes, China's National Development and Reform Commission and Ministry of Finance have said the subsidies would continue throughout 2025, leading analysts to expect new funds for the third quarter to be made available from July. Good luck. 

Of course, like with virtually every other thing in planned, centralized-economies, the stimulus may be boosting one thing while at the same time it is crushing something else. Sure enough, the subsidy program has been met with controversy, ironically, by the auto sector itself. China's auto industry, the world's largest, has attracted criticism from regulators over a deepening price war that has sapped the sector's profitability.

Official media in China's Henan province, where Zhengzhou is the capital, last week reported that China's central government had taken note of some loopholes in the subsidy schemes and would look to make adjustments.

One of the major issues identified by Chinese media and regulators is so-called “zero-mileage used cars”, which refers to the practice of selling brand new cars as heavily discounted second-hand vehicles to get rid of inventory. In other words pretending to sell new cars as used cars, while unleashing catastrophic price cuts across the sector which lead to collapsing margins and failed companies. 

The report in Henan government-owned newspaper Dahe Daily added that sales of “zero-mileage used cars” were one of the key factors leading to subsidies being used up ahead of expectations, necessitating the suspensions. Some businesses were disguising new or nearly new cars as used cars that they could trade in to obtain the subsidies, the newspaper said.

The People's Daily, a national newspaper that often signals the positions of China's top leaders on a variety of issues, also called for a crackdown on the zero-mileage used cars, weeks after Great Wall Motor's Chairman Wei Jianjun publicly condemned the practice.

China's industry ministry in early June summoned automakers to a meeting where it called for the sector to halt its price wars, Reuters reported last week. Since this is China, until one or more collapse, nobody will lift a finger to change anything.

Strait Of Hormuz Disruption Fears Surge After Former Iranian Minister Threatens Transit Restrictions

  As confirmed below by ZeroHedge, the Strait of Hormuz is about to become less easy to cross according to former Iranian Economy Minister Ehsan Khandouzi. 

 Who could have guessed? Well, we did of course. As day follows night, this was highly predictable. So yes, Iran will take a beating, but so will international trade.

 Soon, the no gas from Russia policy of Europe will look more and more like a death wish in a market where oil and gas will be at a premium. 

 We're about to enter a world of unintended consequences. This is why war should never be the first choice on the menu list. This one was truly not necessary. let's hope the momentum doesn't gather speed as we spiral down the drain, but at this stage, it is hard to be optimistic.

​​​​​​​Strait Of Hormuz Disruption Fears Surge After Former Iranian Minister Threatens Transit Restrictions

JPMorgan's forecast of triple-digit Brent crude prices could soon be a reality as conflict risk in and around the Strait of Hormuz intensifies. The waterway, which handles roughly 20% of global oil trade, remains one of the world's most critical maritime chokepoints. Any disruption, particularly amid growing military escalation between Iran and Israel, could impact energy flows worldwide and send prices soaring. 

The most concerning sign of potential maritime disruption in the Strait of Hormuz emerged in the overnight hours via a statement on X by former Iranian Economy Minister Ehsan Khandouzi. While unofficial, the timing and seniority of the comment may reflect broader regime sentiment—or serve as a warning of what's to come.

"Starting tomorrow, for 100 days, no oil tankers or LNG cargoes will be able to pass through the strait without Iran's approval," Khandouzi said. 

He stated, "This policy is decisive if it is implemented "in a timely manner." Any delay in its implementation means enduring more war inside the country. Trump's battle must be ended with a combination of economy and security." 

Such messaging, especially when paired with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) naval activity in the region, raises the increasing probability of IRGC actions targeting commercial shipping lanes in the strait. This escalation could serve as the catalyst that turns JPMorgan's $120–$130 per barrel Brent crude forecast from a scenario into a market reality.

Some more excerpts from the full JPM note

A blockade of the Strait of Hormuz—the world's busiest oil-shipping channel—would shut down the region's oil trade, supercharging oil prices.

The skinny waterway—at its narrowest point it is only 21 miles (33 km) wide— separating the UAE, Oman and Iran, connects the Persian Gulf with the Indian Ocean, and facilitates the movement of some 30% of the world's seaborne oil trade and 20% of the world's LNG supply (Table 1).

Widespread GPS jamming has been reported across the strait for the last several days:

Which unfolded into a maritime disaster early Tuesday when crude oil tanker Front Eagle slammed into the port quarter of the tanker Adalynn, sparking a massive fire on Adalynn, and concerns about a potential ecological disaster have surged. 

All in all, the world's most critical maritime chokepoint appears to be in the crosshairs of the Iranian regime. On Tuesday, President Trump met with his national security team for over an hour to discuss the Middle East and later held a call with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu.

The key question now is whether the U.S. will enter the conflict. If it does, a shipping disruption in the Strait of Hormuz is almost guaranteed—setting the stage for global energy markets to be thrown into turmoil.

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

Virginia Giuffre’s “Deadman’s Switch” Released . . . “I Have Been Murdered – This Is The REAL Epstein List”

  And just on cue, bombshells are starting to explode. Do not expect to read much in the medias. War will clog the waves.

 As for Virginia Guiffre, of course she didn't commit suicide. She was suicided as so many other "dangerous" (for the system) people. She just knew too much related to jeffrey Epstein.  

 Here she names Barak Obama and Bill Gates but beyond the people, it is a system. The Deep State, Mossad and other organizations which main job is to entangle, entrap, compromise the leaders and finally assassinate those who dissent. 

 The goal is domination, the means are infinite: fiat money, the morality inexistant. 

 When the economy was growing, it was Brave New World, they could afford to bribe most people into silence. Now that the tide is receding, they are moving to 1984 and tyranny. The tools will be control, fear and persecution, especially at the international level.

 And day one may be tomorrow! Welcome to the future! 

 Follow to the link below:

Virginia Giuffre’s “Deadman’s Switch” Released . . . “I Have Been Murdered – This Is The REAL Epstein List”

The war with iran is entering a dangerous phase

   Trump has no plan! This was exemplified during his first administration by the nomination of John Bolton, a notorious Neo-con. A fluke most people thought at the time! Or was it rather a feature of Trump's management style? It you have no strategy but goals, will you not eventually become "prisoner" to the people who come to you with a way to achieve your goals, however flawed?

  What if conversely everybody's got Trump wrong? And in that case, what is the real meaning of "Make America Great Again!" ? Could it be maintaining the US primacy and hegemony at ANY cost, including war? 

 At this stage, it looks like Netanyahu is recklessly pushing the US towards a war with Iran that unfortunately Trump may not be able to resit. But what if it was the opposite, wouldn't it make more sense? The Neo-cons having a strategy, Trump has adopted it, hook, line and sinker. Reluctantly or not, it makes no difference at this point. 

 But if this interpretation is right, it does make a huge difference for the rest of the world. The war will not end with Iran. It cannot. If the point is regaining control of the world, then both Russia and China must be reigned in. "Nuclear weapons" was little more than a pretext. Sadam Hussein was launched under the bus when Iraq tried to distance itself from the US dollar, "Weapons of Mass Destruction" were likewise a pretext. As for Kaddafi, they didn't even need a pretext! And now Iran which was also in a similar process of ditching the dollar. Could there be a pattern here? But then what is the real menace to the dollar but the Yuan? 

 Before being military, the war is financial. China, somehow believed that they could finesse their rise below the waterline by slowly building a strong international financial backing before flexing their muscle. With the war in Iran, the US is indicating clearly that this won't happen. China will be restrained to its domestic market, just as Japan was in 1985 after the Plaza Agreements, and any velleity to expand abroad will be nipped in the bud.

 Japan at the time was fully under the American thumb and therefore unable to resit the pressure. And lo, in 30 years, Japan has shrunk from 16% of the world economy to just 2%. 

 In the case of China, the strategy is different. It is to restrain China to a role in manufacturing middle of the range products, with developing countries eating the bottom and developed countries keeping the lid on further progress, sandwitching the nation by favoring other rising nations and curtailing access to technology. You can therefore throttle the pressure just for the sake of "negotiations" although there is of course no real negotiation going on. Kissinger would be proud!  

 To say that the Neo-cons have not thought about everything would be a mistake. Which is why their vision was adopted by Trump in the first place. What other MAGA plan was on the table beyond the rhetoric? 

 Now the plan is about to be implemented. China is not naked. It has access to resources with Russia in a way Japan or Germany before the Second World War did not. This is why Trump keeps coming back to the "mistake" of the Obama Administration to isolate Russia in 2014. This is the main pebble left in the Neo-con "China strategy" shoe. 

 Knowing this, we can understand how events will unfold in the coming weeks. The only unknown factor left in the equation is the reaction of China. A Pearl Harbor 2.0 would be unwise, since the Neo-cons probably have contingencies ready for such a highly predictable event which must consist in strangling oil and resources availability. (As they did for Japan in 1940!) So what will China do?

Iran Prepares To Hit US Regional Bases With Missiles If Trump Joins The War

Update(1637ET): There's widespread reporting that President Trump is mulling direct US military assistance to Israel as it battles Iran, which would mean America getting sucked into another major war in the Middle East. Tehran in response has warned that it is prepared to hit US bases in the region if Trump pulls the trigger:

Iran has prepared missiles and other military equipment for strikes on U.S. bases in the Middle East should the United States join Israel’s war against the country, according to American officials who have reviewed intelligence reports.

The United States has sent about three dozen refueling aircraft to Europe that could be used to assist fighter jets protecting American bases or that would be used to extend the range of bombers involved in any possible strike on Iranian nuclear facilities.

Fears of a wider war are growing among American officials as Israel presses the White House to intervene in its conflict with Iran. If the United States joins the Israeli campaign and strikes Fordo, a key Iranian nuclear facility, the Iranian-backed Houthi militia will almost certainly resume striking ships in the Red Sea, the officials said. They added that pro-Iranian militias in Iraq and Syria would probably try to attack U.S. bases there.

And more: "Other officials said that in the event of an attack, Iran could begin to mine the Strait of Hormuz, a tactic meant to pin American warships in the Persian Gulf," NYT writes.

Meanwhile, the exiled US-backed Iranian monarchy is urgently calling for Iranians to rise up in the streets against the Ayatollah, in a massive development. Reza Pahlavi is issuing these statements from US soil, where the family has long resided...

Trump's national security council meeting in the WH Situation Room has ended. Will tonight bring US warplanes and pilots directly into the conflict - and American troops at regional bases into harm's way?

US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities are on the table, two senior White House officials tell Fox News

Axios reviews of the latest:

  • The White House has discussed the idea of meeting directly with the Iranians this week, but Trump said that would "depend what happens when I get back" to Washington.
  • Two Israeli officials told Axios that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli defense establishment continue to believe the Trump is likely to enter the war in the coming days to bomb Iran's underground enrichment facility.
  • So far the U.S. has helped Israel defend itself from incoming missiles, but declined to take part in offensive operations.

* * *

Update(1232ET): President Trump has very quickly followed up with even more bellicose and alarming statements directly threatening Iran, repeatedly using 'we' - as if the United States military is already directly involved in the ratcheting war. He said in the latest:

We know exactly where the so-called “Supreme Leader” is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don’t want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!

Are we witnessing the start of another regime change war in the Middle East - and with no Congressional input or authorization whatsoever?

Or is this all one big game of [nuclear] chicken, where the hope is that Iran will suddenly raise the white flag? Trump is now suggesting that Israel and the US could go all in until there's nothing short of "unconditional surrender!"...

The escalatory and jingoistic rhetoric could also be because Washington is certainly not used to seeing Israeli cities get pummeled by Iranian hypersonic and ballistic missiles.

Meanwhile, when did Merz become the US State Dept?

GERMAN CHANCELLOR MERZ: THE UNITED STATES WILL DECIDE TODAY WHETHER OR
NOT TO JOIN THE IRAN CONFLICT... DECISION DEPENDS ON WHETHER IRAN
NEGOTIATES

* * * 

Update(1215): While Trump is of course known for verbally shooting from the hip, and is often loose or imprecise with his terms, this is certainly cause for alarm, amid speculation that the US is quickly deepening its involvement in the Israel-Iran war, and yet with no Congressional war authorization or debate.

TRUMP SAYS 'WE' NOW HAVE 'TOTAL CONTROL' OF SKIES OVER IRAN

Is this confirmation of Pentagon direct involvement at this point? Or was this just loosely referring to Israel as an ally?

Whatever the case, this doesn't bode well in terms of America's possible future direct entry, as Trump has vowed to never allow Iran to have nuclear weapons.

* * *

As tensions soar and Americans anxiously contemplate the possibility of yet another major US war in the Middle East, the Trump administration has been in contact with the Iranian government, discussing a possible meeting this week between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and US envoy Steve Witkoff, Axios reports, citing "four sources briefed on the issue."

The outlet also says Trump officials reassured Middle East allies that the administration doesn't plan to join the war unless Americans are targeted -- a clear red line that incentivizes Israel to find a way to drag Iran across it, or to fabricate an incident altogether, much as Israel did in 1954's famed "Lavon Affair" and perhaps its 1967 attack on the USS Liberty. An Arab diplomat in deep contact with Iran says the red line is already very much in mind in Tehran: "The Iranians are very careful so far not to do anything that can push the U.S. to get involved."  

Following those reports, Iran over Monday night pared back the pace of its heavy bombardment of Israel, after consecutive nights of deadly, damaging strikes demonstrating the power of Iran's hypersonic missiles. In a new twist, however, Iran hit Israel with a daylight barrage on Tuesday morning -- albeit one that was reportedly modest in volume, perhaps only 20 missiles. Of course, there's nothing modest about it if you happen to be in one of the impact areas:  

Earlier on Monday, Israel struck various targets in Iran, including the state-run television network IRIB in mid-broadcast (though it quickly resumed broadcasting with the same host). The IDF also claimed it killed a highly senior Iranian general who himself succeeded another general assassinated in Israel's opening of the war.  

The Axios reports come in stark contrast to a stream of bellicose rhetoric emanating from Trump, along with potentially ominous moves of US military assets. On Monday, Trump used social media to say that "everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!" Also yesterday, Fox News reported that the USS Nimitz-led aircraft carrier group was steaming toward the Middle East from the South China Sea, where it will join the already on-station USS Carl Vinson strike group. At the same time, a large number of military refueling aircraft were being deployed to Europe. 

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi (Photo via IRNA)

Even if the reports of US diplomatic outreach are true, from Iran's perspective, little or nothing the Trump administration says can be trusted, and even ostensibly peaceful overtures must be evaluated as a potential tactic to set up a surprise US strike. After all, Israel's initiation of a war on Iran came two days before American and Iranian delegations were scheduled to meet in Oman for a sixth round of discussions pursuant to a new deal about Iran's nuclear program. Since Israel's attack, Trump has repeatedly stated that he knew about it in advance, saying for example that "We were well-informed about everything," and "I always knew the date."  

Here's what one official told Axios about the pursuit of a new meeting:  

"A meeting with the Iranians this week is under consideration...They do want to talk. But what we don't know is, have they been brought to their knees fully so that they realize that in order to have a country, they have to talk? And assuming they get there, is there any degree of [uranium] enrichment you would allow them to have?"

The suggestion that Iran is anywhere close to being "on its knees" seems fanciful, considering Iran has launched multiple missile barrages, the effects of which have significantly exceeded expectations. Two dozen Israelis have been killed and at least 400 injured, with the country also enduring major hits to government buildings, apartment towers and power plants. The starring role in those barrages has been played by Iran's highly advanced hypersonic missiles -- a weapon that neither Israel nor even the United States has in its arsenal: 

The unnamed official's rhetorical question about whether there's "any amount of enrichment" the US would allow may offer a glimmer of hope for an end to the Israel-initiated war. Iran sees enrichment as a right it possesses as a sovereign state, and has repeatedly said an outright ban on enrichment is completely out of the question. Iran has long been under a religious order, or "fatwa," forbidding the development of any weapon of mass destruction, and the country has long assured the world that it has no intention of building a nuclear weapon -- an assurance the US intelligence community validated in 2007 and has repeatedly re-confirmed since then -- most recently, just this March. Meanwhile, anti-Iran hawks have been warning of an imminent Iranian nuclear bomb for more than three decades:  

In this major New York Times article from 30 years ago, one senior official said Iran's "intensive effort" put them on pace to have all the requisite atomic bomb components" in two years" 

The seeds of today's crisis were sown in May 2018, when Trump withdrew the United States from the nuclear deal that had been negotiated between Iran and various Western governments and signed in 2015. Under that deal, Iran agreed to a wide array of safeguards. They included eliminating its medium-enriched uranium, reducing its low-enriched uranium inventory by 98%, capping future enrichment at 3.67%, slashing its number of centrifuges, submitting to enhanced external monitoring and rendering its heavy-water reactor unusable by pouring concrete in it. At the time of Trump's withdrawal, Iran was in full compliance, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. In response to the re-imposition of US sanctions, Iran began straying from the deal's terms, seemingly pushing the only lever it had to bring the deal back and get out from under sanctions that have sapped Iran's economy and inflicted a cruel toll on innocent Iranian citizens

The 2015 deal was so thorough that Trump's pursuit of a new agreement puts him in the awkward position of finding a way to differentiate it from the one he repeatedly railed against on the 2016 campaign trail, and again as he killed it. Iran hawks have been pushing for a deal that bans nuclear enrichment altogether. Some may take that position out of sincere concern, but the most powerful hawks in Israel and America certainly take it with full knowledge that Iran will never accept it, helping pave the way for the US-led war they've long yearned for. 

Indeed, soon after Israel's war on Iran began, Israel and its US-based collaborators began pressing Trump to commit the American military to the fight -- in defiance of his campaign promises to end the era of endless US wars. Trump needn't burden himself with that decision: The US Constitution vests the power to initiate war with Congress.

Jeffrey Sachs: US Prepares to Join War Against Iran (Video - 31mn)

   A scathing denunciation of Israel, the US and basically the whole West at this point, which is aligned behind the Zionist dream of a greater Israel controlling the Arab world through invasions and assassinations around the Middle East.

  I wonder what Jeffrey Sachs will have to say in a few days after the US enters the fray as it looks more and more likely? 

  "We" Americans didn't vote for this? Well, who has ever voted for war? The Lords do wars, the peasants do their bidding. More generally, our societies can indeed afford "democracy" in time of peace, but in time of war? Come on! Let's be serious. 

  We are heading towards momentous events in the coming months!

  Follow the link below to watch the video on YouTube: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzfZD2BWcbM

  And an even more scathing description of the war in Iran as a joint US-Israel attack  by Ben Norton on Geopolitical: (The best and most complete analysis you can find on the war at this stage.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwH780cEcEQ

Or directly on their web site:

 https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/

 

China Auto Industry On Verge Of Collapse As Six Major Cities Run Out Of Car-Buying Subsidies

  Difficult not to recognize a perfect bubble bursting in China right now exactly in line with what happened in Japan in the 1990s.    The r...