It follows on my previous article concerning the control of Congress by the deep state but extend the scope to the whole US Government and details the full control mechanism.
It explains how people who killed a president then later invented the concept of conspiracy theories to muddy the tracks leading to their own crime, slowly but relentlessly took over the US Government.
It explains why, what you're left with at the highest level of power in America are either incompetent stooges or corrupt criminals and why "the system" has no problem contemplating the re-election of a President obviously senile. Biden's Uncle may or may not have been eaten by cannibals in Papua New Guinea but his government has definitively been eaten by the CIA whole. In any case, whatever he says has no importance or consequences whatsoever. The only decisions he is making nowadays is the flavor of his ice cream cones on the beach in Delaware!
In all likelihood, the Presidency of Joe Biden will mark the end of democracy in America. As usual, the trappings of the system will remain in place although the actual functioning will be completely hollowed out. The next presidency will be a show and a shamble. The economy will crash and people will have no say whatsoever in what comes next. But that's another story. Here's how the current state of affairs unwrapped:
Authored by 'sundance' via TheConservativeTreehouse.com,
Barack
Obama and Eric Holder did not create a weaponized DOJ and FBI; instead,
what they did was take the preexisting system and retool it so the
weapons only targeted one side of the political continuum. This point
is where many people understandably get confused...
In
the era shortly after 9/11, the DC national security apparatus was
constructed to preserve continuity of government and simultaneously view
all Americans as potential threats. The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence
(ODNI) were created specifically for this purpose.
What
Barack Obama and Eric Holder did with that new construct was refine the
internal targeting mechanisms so that only their ideological opposition
became the target of the new national security system. This is very
important to understand as you dig deeper into this research outline.
Washington DC created the modern national security apparatus immediately and hurriedly after
9/11/01. DHS came along in 2002, and within the Intelligence Reform
and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 the ODNI was formed. When Barack
Obama and Eric Holder arrived a few years later, those newly formed
institutions were viewed as opportunities to create a very specific
national security apparatus that would focus almost exclusively against
their political opposition.
The preexisting Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) and Dept of Justice (DOJ) were then repurposed to
become two of the four pillars of the domestic national security
apparatus. However, this new construct would have a targeting mechanism
based on political ideology. The DHS, ODNI, DOJ and FBI became the four pillars of this new institution. Atop these pillars is where you will find the Fourth Branch of Government.
We were not sleeping when this happened, we were wide awake.
However, we were stunningly distracted by the economic collapse that
was taking place in 2006 and 2007 when the engineers behind Obama
started to assemble the design. By the time Obama took office in 2009,
we sensed something profound was shifting, but we can only see exactly
what shifted in the aftermath. The four pillars were put into place,
and a new Fourth Branch of Government was quietly created.
As
time passed, and the system operators became familiar with their new
tools, technology allowed the tentacles of the system to reach out and
touch us. That is when we first started to notice that
something very disconcerting was happening. Those four pillars are the
root of it, and if we take the time to understand how the Fourth Branch
originated, questions about this current state of perpetual angst will
start to make sense.
Grab a cup of your favorite beverage, and
take a walk with me as we outline how this was put together. You might
find many of the questions about our current state of political affairs
beginning to make a lot more sense.
Remember,
it is not my intent to outline the entire history of how we got to this
place where the intelligence community now acts as the superseding
fourth branch of government. Such an effort would be exhausting and
likely take our discussion away from understanding the current dynamic.
History
provided enough warnings from Dwight D. Eisenhower (military), to John
F. Kennedy (CIA), to Richard Nixon (FBI), to all modern versions of
warnings and frustrations from HPSCI Devin Nunes and ODNI Ric Grenell.
None of those prior reference points are invalid, and all documented
outlines of historic reference are likely true and accurate. However, a
generational review is not useful, as the reference impacting us ‘right now‘ gets lost.
Instead,
we pick up the expansive and weaponized intelligence system as it
manifests after 9/11/01, and my goal is to highlight how the modern
version of the total intelligence apparatus has now metastasized into a
Fourth Branch of Government. It is this superseding branch that now
touches and influences every facet of our life.
If we take
the modern construct, originating at the speed of technological change,
we can also see how the oversight or “check/balance” in our system of
government became functionally obsolescent.
After many
years of granular research about the intelligence apparatus inside our
government, in the summer of 2020 I visited Washington DC to ask
specific questions. My goal was to go where the influence agents within
government actually operate, and to discover the people deep inside the
institutions no one elected and few people pay attention to.
It was during this process when
I discovered how information is purposefully put into containment
silos; essentially a formal process to block the flow of information
between agencies and between the original branches. While frustrating to
discover, the silo effect was important because understanding the
communication between networks leads to our ability to reconcile
conflict between what we perceive and what’s actually taking place.
After
days of research and meetings in DC during 2020; amid a town that was
serendipitously shut down due to COVID-19; I found a letter slid under
the door of my room in a nearly empty hotel with an introduction of
sorts. The subsequent discussions were perhaps the most important. After
many hours of specific questions and answers on specific examples, I
realized why our nation is in this mess. That is when I discovered the
fourth and superseding branch of government, the Intelligence Branch.
I am going to explain how the Intelligence Branch works:
(1) to control every other branch of government;
(2) how it functions as an entirely independent branch of government with no oversight;
(3) how and why it was created to be independent from oversight;
(4) what is the current mission of the IC Branch,
and most importantly (5) who operates it.
The
Intelligence Branch is an independent functioning branch of government,
it is no longer a subsidiary set of agencies within the Executive
Branch as most would think. To understand the Intelligence Branch, we
need to drop the elementary school civics class lessons about three
coequal branches of government and replace that outlook with the modern
system that created itself.
The Intelligence Branch functions much
like the State Dept, through a unique set of public-private
partnerships that support it. Big Tech industry collaboration with
intelligence operatives is part of that functioning; almost like an NGO.
However, the process is much more important than most think. In this
problematic perspective of a corrupt system of government, the process
is the flaw – not the outcome.
There are people making decisions
inside this little known, unregulated and out-of-control branch of
government that impact every facet of our lives.
None of the
people operating deep inside the Intelligence Branch were elected, and
our elected representative House members genuinely do not know how the
system works. I assert this position affirmatively because I have talked
to House and Senate staffers, including the chiefs of staff for
multiple House & Senate committee seats. They are not malicious
people; however, they are genuinely clueless of things that happen
outside their silo. That is part of the purpose of me explaining it,
with examples, in full detail with sunlight.
We begin….
In
April of 2016, the FBI launched a counterintelligence operation against
presidential candidate Donald Trump. The questioning about that
operation is what New York Representative Elise Stefanik cites in March
of 2017, approximately 11 months later (First Two Minutes).
Things to note:
Notice how FBI Director James Comey just matter-of-factly explains no one outside the DOJ was informed about the FBI operation. Why? Because that’s just the way things are done. His justification for unilateral operations was “because of the sensitivity of the matter“,
totally ignoring any constitutional or regulatory framework for
oversight; because, well, quite simply, there isn’t any. The
intelligence apparatus inside the DOJ/FBI can, and does, operate based
on their own independent determinations of authority.
Notice
also how FBI Director Comey shares his perspective that informing the
National Security Council (NSC) is the equivalent of notifying the White
House. The FBI leadership expressly believe they bear no
responsibility to brief the Chief Executive. As long as they tell some
unknown, unelected, bureaucratic entity inside the NSC, their unwritten
responsibility to inform the top of their institutional silo is
complete. If the IC wants to carve out the Oval Office, they simply
plant information inside the NSC and, from their perspective, their
civic responsibility to follow checks-and-balances is complete. This is
an intentional construct.
Notice how Comey
obfuscates notification to the Director of National Intelligence (DNI),
by avoiding the fact James Clapper was the DNI from outset of the
counterintelligence operation throughout the remainder of Obama’s term.
When I get deeper into the process, we will understand how the
Intelligence Branch has intentionally used the creation of the DNI
position (established post 9/11/01) as a method to avoid oversight, not
enhance it. Keeping an oblivious doofus like James Clapper in position
held strategic value [Doofus Reminder HERE].
That
video of James Comey being questioned by Elise Stefanik was the first
example given to me by someone who knew the background of everything
that was taking place preceding that March 20, 2017, hearing. That FBI
reference point is a key to understand how the Intelligence Branch
operates with unilateral authority above Congress (legislative branch),
above the White House (executive branch), and even above the court
system (judicial branch).
Also, watch this short video of James
Clapper because it is likely many readers have forgotten, and likely
even more readers have never seen it. Watch closely how
then White House national security adviser John Brennan is responding
in that video. This is before Brennan became CIA Director, this is when
Brennan was helping Barack Obama put the pillars into place. WATCH:
[Sidebar: Every time I post this video it gets scrubbed from YouTube (example), so save it if you ever want to see it again.]
The
video of James Clapper highlights how the ODNI position (created with
good national security intention) ended up becoming the fulcrum for
modern weaponization, and is now an office manipulated by agencies with a
vested interest in retaining power. The Intelligence Branch holds power
over the ODNI through their influence and partnership with the body
that authorizes the power within it, the Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence (SSCI).
Factually, the modern intelligence apparatus
uses checks and balances in their favor. The checks create silos of
proprietary information, classified information, vaults of information
that work around oversight issues. The silos are part of the problem.
Ironically,
the Office of the Director of National Intelligence was created in the
aftermath of 9/11/01 expressly to eliminate the silos of information
which they felt led to a domestic terrorist attack that could have been
prevented. The ODNI was created specifically upon the recommendation of
the 9/11 commission.
The intent was to create a central hub of
intelligence information, inside the Executive Branch, where the CIA,
NSA, DoD, DoS, and DIA could deposit their unique intelligence products
and a repository would be created so that domestic intelligence
operations, like the DOJ and FBI could access them when needed to
analyze threats to the U.S. This, they hoped, would ensure the obvious
flags missed in the 9/11 attacks would not be missed again.
The DNI office created a problem for those who operate in the shadows of proprietary information.
You’ll see how it was critical to install a person uniquely skilled in
being an idiot, James Clapper, into that willfully blind role while
intelligence operatives worked around the office to assemble the
Intelligence Branch of Government.
Why does this
matter? Because many people think defunding the Intelligence Community
is a solution; it is not…. at least, not yet. Worse yet, the corrupt
divisions deep inside the U.S. intelligence system can now fund
themselves from multinational private sector partnerships (banks,
corporations and foreign entities).
When Democrats took
over the House of Representatives in January 2007, they took office with
a plan. Nancy Pelosi became Speaker, and Democrats controlled the
Senate where Harry Reid was Majority Leader. Barack Obama was a junior
senator from Illinois.
Pelosi and Reid intentionally did
not advance a budget in 2008 (for fiscal year 2009) because their plan
included installing Barack Obama (and all that came with him) with an
open checkbook made even more lucrative by a worsening financial crisis
and a process called baseline budgeting. Baseline budgeting means the
prior fiscal year budget is accepted as the starting point for the next
year budget. All previous expenditures are baked into the cake within
baseline budgeting.
Massive bailouts preceded Obama’s installation
due to U.S. economic collapse, and massive bailouts continued after his
installation. This is the ‘never let a crisis go to waste’ aspect. TARP
(Troubled Asset Recovery Program), auto bailouts (GM), and the massive
stimulus spending bill, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
(ARRA, ie. those shovel ready jobs) were all part of the non budget
spending. The federal reserve assisted with Quantitative Easing (QE1 and
QE2) as congress passed various Porkulous spending bills further
spending and replacing the formal budget process.
Note: There has never been a budget passed in the normal/traditional process since September of 2007.
- While Obama’s radical ‘transformation‘
was triggered across a broad range of government institutions,
simultaneously spending on the U.S. military was cut, but spending on
the intelligence apparatus expanded. We were all distracted by
Obamacare, and the Republican party wanted to keep us that way. However,
in the background there was a process of transformation taking place
that included very specific action by Eric Holder and targeted effort
toward the newest executive agency the ODNI.
The people
behind Obama, those same people now behind Joe Biden, knew from years of
strategic planning that ‘radical transformation’ would require control
over specific elements inside the U.S. government. Eric Holder played a
key role in his position as U.S. Attorney General in the DOJ.
AG
Holder recruited ideologically aligned political operatives who were
aware of the larger institutional objectives. One of those objectives
was weaponizing the DOJ-National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) a division
inside the DOJ that had no inspector general oversight. For most people
the DOJ-NSD weaponization surfaced with a hindsight awakening of the
DOJ-NSD targeting candidate Donald Trump many years later. However, by
then the Holder crew had executed almost eight full years of background
work.
- The second larger Obama/Holder objective was control
over the FBI. Why was that important? Because the FBI does the domestic
investigative work on anyone who needs or holds a security clearance.
The removal of security clearances could be used as a filter to further
build the internal ideological army they were assembling. Additionally,
with new power in the ODNI created as a downstream consequence of the
Patriot Act, new protocols for U.S. security clearances were easy to
justify.
Carefully selecting fellow ideological travelers
was facilitated by this filtration within the security clearance
process. How does that issue later manifest? Just look around at how
politicized every intelligence agency has become, specifically including
the FBI.
- At the exact same time this new background security
clearance process was ongoing, again everyone distracted by the fight
over Obamacare, inside the Department of State (Secretary Hillary
Clinton) a political alignment making room for the next phase was being
assembled. Names like Samantha Power, Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton
were familiar on television while Lisa Monaco worked as a legal liaison
between the Obama White House and Clinton State Department.
Through
the Dept of State (DoS) the intelligence apparatus began working on
their first steps to align Big Tech with a larger domestic institutional
objective. Those of you who remember the “Arab Spring”, some say
“Islamist Spring”, will remember it was triggered by Barack Obama’s
speech in Cairo – his first foreign trip. The State Department worked
with grassroots organizers (mostly Muslim Brotherhood) in Egypt, Syria,
Bahrain, Qatar and Libya. Obama leaned heavily on the organizational
network of Turkish President Recep Erdogan for contacts and support.
Why
does this aspect matter to us? Well, you might remember how much effort
the Obama administration put into recruiting Facebook and Twitter as
resources for the various mideast rebellions the White House and DoS
supported. This was the point of modern merge between the U.S.
intelligence community and Big Tech social media.
In many ways,
the coordinated political outcomes in Libya and Egypt were the beta test
for the coordinated domestic political outcomes we saw in the 2020 U.S.
presidential election. The U.S. intelligence community working with
social media platforms and political operatives.
Overlaying all of
that background activity was also a new alignment of the Obama-era
intelligence apparatus with ideological federal “contractors“.
Where does this contractor activity manifest? In the FISA Court opinion
of Rosemary Collyer who cited the “interagency memorandum of
understanding”, or MOU.
Hopefully,
you can see a small part of how tentacled the system to
organize/weaponize the intelligence apparatus was. None of this was
accidental, all of this was by design, and the United States Senate was
responsible for intentionally allowing most of this to take place.
That’s
the 30,000/ft level backdrop history of what was happening as the
modern IC was created. Next we will go into how all these various
intelligence networks began working in unison and how they currently
control all of the other DC institutions under them; including how they
can carve out the President from knowing their activity.
- When
Barack Obama was installed in January 2009, the Democrats held a 60
seat majority in the U.S. Senate. As the people behind the Obama
installation began executing their longer-term plan, the Senate Select
Committee on Intelligence was a tool to create the Intelligence Branch;
it was not an unintentional series of events.
When
Obama was installed, Dianne Feinstein was the Chair of the Senate Select
Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), and Democrat operative Dan Jones was
her lead staffer. Feinstein was completely controlled by those around
her including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. The CIA was in the
process of turning over personnel following the Bush era, and as a
result of a massive multi-year narrative of diminished credibility (Iraq
WMD), a deep purge was underway. Obama/Holder were in the process of
shifting intelligence alignment and the intensely political Democrat
Leader Harry Reid was a key participant.
THE TRAP –
Many people say that Congress is the solution to eliminating the Fourth
and superseding Branch of Government, the Intelligence Branch. This is
an exercise in futility because the Legislative Branch, specifically the
SSCI, facilitated the creation of the Intelligence Branch. The SSCI
cannot put the genie they created back in the bottle without admitting
they too are corrupt; and the background story of their corruption is
way too intense to be exposed now.
Every member of the SSCI is
compromised in some controlling manner. Those Senators who disliked the
control over them; specifically disliked because the risk of sunlight
was tenuous and, well, possible; have either left completely or stepped
down from the committee. None of the SSCI members past or present would
ever contemplate saying openly what their tenure involved.
[Note:
You might remember when Vice Chairman Mark Warner’s text messages
surfaced, there was a controlled Republican SSCI member who came to his
defense in February of 2018. It was not accidental that exact Senator
later became the chair of the SSCI himself. That Republican Senator is
Marco Rubio, now vice-chair since the Senate re-flipped back to the
optics of Democrat control in 2021.]
All of President Obama’s
2009 intelligence appointments required confirmation from the Senate.
The nominees had to first pass through the Democrat controlled SSCI, and
then to a full Senate vote where Democrats held a 60 vote majority.
Essentially, Obama got everyone he wanted in place easily. Rahm Emmanuel
was Obama’s Chief of Staff, and Valerie Jarrett was Senior Advisor.
Tim
Geithner was Treasury Secretary in 2010 when the joint DOJ/FBI and IRS
operation to target the Tea Party took place after the midterm
“shellacking” caused by the Obamacare backlash. Mitch McConnell was
Minority Leader in the Senate but supported the targeting of the Tea
Party as his Senate colleagues were getting primaried by an angry and effective grassroots campaign. McConnell’s friend, Senator Bob Bennett, getting beaten in Utah was the final straw.
Dirty
Harry and Mitch McConnell saw the TEA Party through the same prism. The
TEA Party took Kennedy’s seat in Massachusetts (Scott Brown); Sharon
Angle was about to take out Harry Reid in Nevada; Arlen Spector was
taken down in Pennsylvania; Senator Robert Byrd died; Senator Lisa
Murkowski lost her primary to Joe Miller in Alaska; McConnell’s nominee
Mike Castle lost to Christine O’Donnell in Delaware; Rand Paul won in
Kentucky. This is the background. The peasants were revolting…. and
visibly angry Mitch McConnell desperately made a deal with the devil to protect himself.
In
many ways, the TEA Party movement was/is very similar to the MAGA
movement. The difference in 2010 was the absence of a head of the
movement, in 2015 Donald Trump became that head figure who benefited
from the TEA Party energy. Trump came into office in 2017 with the same
congressional opposition as the successful TEA Party candidates in 2011.
Republicans
took control of the Senate following the 2014 mid-terms. Republicans
took control of the SSCI in January 2015. Senator Richard Burr became
chairman of the SSCI, and Dianne Feinstein shifted to Vice-Chair. Dirty
Harry Reid left the Senate, and Mitch McConnell took power again.
Republicans
were in control of the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2015 when the
Intelligence Branch operation against candidate Donald Trump was
underway. [Feinstein’s staffer, Dan Jones, left the SSCI so he could act
as a liaison and political operative between private-sector efforts
(Fusion GPS, Chris Steele) and the SSCI.] The SSCI was a participant in
that Fusion-GPS/Chris Steele operation, and as a direct consequence
Republicans were inherently tied to the problem with President Trump
taking office in January of 2017. Indiana Republican Senator Dan Coats
was a member of the SSCI.
Bottom line…. When it came to
the intelligence system targeting Donald Trump during the 2015/2016
primary, the GOP was just as much at risk as their Democrat
counterparts.
When Trump unexpectedly won the 2016
election, the SSCI was shocked more than most. They knew countermeasures
would need to be deployed to protect themselves from any exposure of
their intelligence conduct. Dianne Feinstein stepped down, and Senator
Mark Warner was elevated to Vice Chairman.
Indiana’s own Mike
Pence, now Vice President, recommended fellow Hoosier, SSCI Senator Dan
Coats, to become President Trump’s Director of National Intelligence
(ODNI). [Apply hindsight here]
- To give an
idea of the Intelligence Branch power dynamic, remind yourself how House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), Chairman Devin
Nunes, tried to get access to the DOJ/FBI records of the FISA
application used against the Trump campaign via Carter Page.
Remember,
Devin Nunes only saw a portion of the FISA trail from his review of a
Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) previously given to President Obama.
Chairman Nunes had to review the PDB at the White House SCIF due to
compartmented intelligence, another example of the silo benefit.
Remember
the massive stonewalling and blocking of the DOJ/FBI toward Nunes?
Remember the back and forth battle over declassification surrounding the
Nunes memo?
Remember, after Nunes went directly to House
Speaker Paul Ryan for help (didn’t get any), the DOJ only permitted two
members from each party within the HPSCI to review the documents, and
only at the DOJ offices of main justice?
Contrast that amount of
House Intel Committee railroading and blocking by intelligence
operatives in the DOJ, DOJ-NSD and FBI, with the simple request by
Senate Intelligence Vice Chairman Mark Warner asking to see the Carter
Page FISA application and immediately a copy being delivered to him on
March 17th 2017.
Can you see which intelligence committee is aligned with the deepest part of the deep state?
Oh, how quickly we forget:
The
contrast of ideological alignment between the House, Senate and
Intelligence Branch is crystal clear when viewed through the prism of
cooperation. You can see which legislative committee holds the power and
support of the Intelligence Branch. The Senate Intel Committee
facilitates the corrupt existence of the IC Branch, so the IC Branch
only cooperates with the Senate Intel Committee. It really is that
simple.
- The Intelligence Branch carefully selects
its own members by controlling how security clearances are investigated
and allowed (FBI). The Intelligence Branch also uses
compartmentalization of intelligence as a way to keep each agency, and
each downstream branch of government (executive, legislative and
judicial), at arms length as a method to stop anyone from seeing the
larger picture of their activity. I call this the “silo effect“, and it is done by design.
I
have looked at stunned faces when I presented declassified silo product
from one agency to the silo customers of another. You would be
astonished at what they don’t know because it is not in their ‘silo’.
Through
the advise and consent rules, the Intelligence Branch uses the SSCI to
keep out people they consider dangerous to their ongoing operations. Any
appointee to the intelligence community must first pass through the
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, before they get a full Senate
vote. If the SSCI rejects the candidate, they simply refuse to take up
the nomination. The president is then blocked from that appointment.
This is what happened with President Trump over-and-over again.
- Additionally,
the Intelligence Branch protects itself, and its facilitating allies
through the formal classification process. The Intelligence Branch gets
to decide unilaterally what information will be released and what
information will be kept secret. There is no entity outside the
Intelligence Branch, and yes that includes the President of the United
States, who can supersede the classification authority of the
Intelligence Branch. {Go Deep} and {Go Deep} This is something 99.9% of the people on our side get totally and frustratingly wrong.
No
one can declassify, or make public, anything the Intelligence Branch
will not agree to. Doubt this? Ask Ric Grenell, John Ratcliffe, or even
President Trump himself.
- The classification process is
determined inside the Intelligence Branch, all by themselves. They get
to choose what rank of classification exists on any work-product they
create; and they get to decide what the classification status is of any
work product that is created by anyone else. The Intelligence Branch has
full control over what is considered classified information and what is
not. The Intelligence Branch defines what is a “national security
interest” and what is not. A great technique for hiding fingerprints of
corrupt and illegal activity.
[For familiar reference
see the redactions to Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages. The
Intelligence Branch does all redactions.]
- Similarly, the declassification process is
a request by an agency, even a traditionally superior agency like the
President of the United States, to the Intelligence Branch asking for
them to release the information. The Intelligence Branch again holds
full unilateral control. If the head of the CIA refuses to comply with
the declassification instruction of the President, what can the
president do except fire him/her? {Again, GO DEEP} How
does the President replace the non-compliant cabinet member? They have
to go through the SSCI confirmation. See the problem?
Yes,
there are ways to break up the Intelligence Branch, but they do not
start with any congressional effort. As you can see above, the process
is the flaw – not the solution. Most conservative pundits have their
emphasis on the wrong syllable. Their cornerstone is false.
For
their own self-preservation, the Intelligence Branch has been
interfering in our elections for years. The way to tear this apart
begins with STATE LEVEL election reform that blocks the Legislative Branch from coordinating with the Intelligence Branch.
The
extreme federalism approach is critical and also explains why Joe Biden
has instructed Attorney General Merrick Garland to use the full power
of the DOJ to stop state level election reform efforts. The worry of
successful state level election control is also why the Intelligence
Branch now needs to support the federal takeover of elections.
Our
elections have been usurped by the Intelligence Branch. Start with
honest elections and we will see just how much Democrat AND Republican
corruption is dependent on manipulated election results. Start at the
state level. Start there…. everything else is downstream.
People want examples, reference points for work the Intelligence Branch conducts, specifically how it protects itself.
Here is an example: Julian Assange.
Yes,
the history of the U.S. national security apparatus goes back decades;
however, the weaponization of that apparatus, the creation of an apex
branch of government, the Intelligence Branch, originated –as we currently feel it– under President Barack Obama.
Obama
took the foundational tools created by Bill Clinton and George W. Bush
and used the intelligence system architecture to create a weapon for use
in his fundamental transformation. An alliance of ideologues within
government (intel community) and the private sector (big tech and
finance) was assembled, and the largest government weapon was created.
Think about this every time you take your shoes off at an airport.
After the weapon was assembled and tested (Arab Spring), the Legislative Branch was enjoined under the auspices of a common enemy,
Donald J. Trump, an outsider who was a risk to every entity in the
institutional construct of Washington DC. Trillions were at stake, and
years of affluence and influence were at risk as the unholy alliance was
put together.
To understand the risk that Julian Assange represented to
U.S. Intelligence Branch interests, it is important to understand just
how extensive the operations of the FBI/CIA were in 2016.
It is
within the network of foreign and domestic intel operations where
Intelligence Branch political tool, FBI Agent Peter Strzok, was working
as a bridge between the CIA and FBI counterintelligence operations.
By now, people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving
Joseph Mifsud, the Maltese professor generally identified as a western
intelligence operative who was tasked by the FBI/CIA to run an operation
against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy
(Rome) and London. {Go Deep}
In a similar fashion, the FBI tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to
target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices
of being a Cambridge Professor, Stefan Halper also targeted General
Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent
under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos.
The
initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all
based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets
and the targets much easier.
HPSCI Ranking Member Devin Nunes outlined how very specific exculpatory evidence was
known to the FBI and yet withheld from the FISA application used
against Carter Page that also mentions George Papadopoulos. The FBI also
fabricated information in the FISA.
However, there is an aspect
to the domestic U.S. operation that also bears the fingerprints of the
international intelligence apparatus; only this time, due to the
restrictive laws on targets inside the U.S., the CIA aspect is less
prominent. This is where FBI Agent Peter Strzok working for both
agencies was important.
Remember, it’s clear in the text messages
Strzok had a working relationship with what he called their “sister
agency”, the CIA. Additionally, former CIA Director John Brennan has admitted Strzok
helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA)
which outlines the Russia narrative; and Peter Strzok wrote the July
31st, 2016, “Electronic Communication” that originated FBI operation
“Crossfire Hurricane.” Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief allied intelligence officials connected to the Australian Ambassador to the U.K, Alexander Downer.
In
short, Peter Strzok acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The
perfect type of FBI career agent for the Intelligence Branch and CIA
Director John Brennan to utilize.
Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015; at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors”
were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information
on a specific set of U.S. persons, the 2015 GOP candidates for
President.
It was also Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was
domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskaya.
A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak
Albertovich Karapetyan was working double agents for the CIA and
Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S.
Glenn
Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with
Donald Trump Jr. However, once the CIA/Fusion-GPS operation using
Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting… back in Russia
Deputy AG Karapetyan died in a helicopter crash.
Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against republican presidential candidates.
According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s private sector handler [NOTE:
remember, the public-private sector partnership], it was FBI agent Peter
Strzok who was giving Patrick Byrne the instructions on where to send
Butina. {Go Deep}
All
of this context outlines the extent to which the FBI/CIA was openly
involved in constructing a political operation that eventually settled
upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit. The international
operations of the Intelligence Branch were directed by the FBI/CIA; and
the domestic operations were coordinated by Peter Strzok operating with a
foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin]
Recap:
Mifsud tasked against Papadopoulos (CIA).
Halper tasked against Flynn (CIA), Page (CIA), and Papadopoulos (CIA).
Azra Turk, pretending to be a Halper asst, tasked against Papadopoulos (FBI).
Veselnitskaya tasked against Donald Trump Jr (CIA, Fusion-GPS).
Butina tasked against Donald Trump Jr (FBI). All of these activities were coordinated.
Additionally,
Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer, hired by Fusion
GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within
his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch,
who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to
participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and
create the impression of Russian involvement. However, Deripaska refused to participate.
All
of this foreign and domestic engagement was directly controlled by
collaborating U.S. intelligence agencies from inside the Intelligence
Branch. And all of this coordinated activity was intended to give a
specific Russia influence/interference impression.
The key
point of all that background context is to see how committed the
Intelligence Branch was to the constructed narrative of Russia
interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the
DOJ and DOJ-NSD, put a hell of a lot of work into it.
We also know that John Durham looked at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talked to CIA analysts who participated in
the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false
appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This is
important because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian
Assange and Wikileaks.
On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the EDVA. From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:
(Link to pdf)
On Tuesday April 15th more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….
The FBI investigation took place prior to December
2017, and it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia
(EDVA) where Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury
indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.
Why the delay?
What was the DOJ waiting for?
Here’s where it gets interesting….
The
FBI submission to the Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months
after Congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of
2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked
Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”
(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon)
Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the
leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s
election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful
information about the leaks in the near future.
Rep. Dana
Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and
chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the
first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour
private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the
WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.
Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.
“Our
three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the
WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails
during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian
emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking
or disclosure of those emails.”
Pressed for more detail
on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to
share privately with President Trump. (read more)
Knowing
how much effort the Intelligence Branch put into the false Russia
collusion-conspiracy narrative, it would make sense for the FBI to take
keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and
Assange, monitor all activity, and why the FBI would quickly gather
specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand
jury by December 2017.
Within three months of the EDVA grand jury, the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018.
The DOJ sat on the indictment while the Mueller/Weissmann probe was ongoing.
As
soon as the Mueller/Weissmann probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a
planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed;
Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian
embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).
As
a person who has researched this fiasco; including the ridiculously
false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence
agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16; and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17; this timing against Assange is too coincidental.
It
doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to
control Julian Assange. The Weissmann/Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes for justification, and that narrative was contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes.
- This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains
claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the
Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is
directly disputed by WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, as outlined during
the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange on-the-record
statements.
The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The
fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence
community assessment; and the only factual evidence claimed within the
ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by
relying on forensic computer analysis from Crowdstrike, a DNC and FBI
contractor.
The CIA holds a self-interest in upholding the Russian
hacking claim; the FBI holds an interest in maintaining that claim; the
U.S. media hold an interest in maintaining that claim. All of the
foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan
and Strzok also have a self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking
and interference narrative.
Julian Assange is the only
person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC
emails; and Assange has claimed he has evidence it was not from a hack.
This “Russian hacking”
claim was ultimately important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K
intelligence apparatus, it forms the corner of their justification. With
that level of importance, well, right there is the obvious motive to
shut Julian Assange down as soon as intelligence officials knew the
Weissmann/Mueller report was going to be public.
…. and that’s exactly what they did. They threw a bag over Assange.
- COLLAPSED OVERSIGHT –
The modern system to ‘check’ the Executive Branch was the creation of
the legislative “Gang of Eight,” a legislative oversight mechanism
intended to provide a bridge of oversight between the authority of the
intelligence community within the Executive Branch.
The Go8
construct was designed to allow the President authority to carry out
intelligence operations and provide the most sensitive notifications to a
select group within Congress.
The Go8 oversight is directed to
the position, not the person, and consists of: (1) The Speaker of the
House; (2) The Minority Leader of the House; (3) The Chair of the House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, HPSCI; (4) The Ranking
Member (minority) of the HPSCI; (5) The Leader of the Senate; (6) The
Minority Leader of the Senate; (7) The Chair of the Senate Select
Committee on Intelligence, SSCI; and finally (8) the Vice-Chair of the
SSCI.
Example: When the Chief Executive (the President) initiates
an intelligence operation on behalf of the United States, the President
triggers a “finding memo.” In essence, the instruction to the intel
agency or agencies to authorize a covert operation. When that process
takes place, the Go8 are the first people notified. Depending on the
sensitivity of the operation, sometimes the G08 are notified immediately
after the operation is conducted. The notification can be a phone call
or an in-person briefing.
Because of the sensitivity of their
intelligence information, the Gang of Eight hold security clearances
that permit them to receive and review all intelligence operations. The
intelligence community are also responsible for briefing the Go8 with
the same information they use to brief the President.
~ 2021 Gang of Eight ~
The
Go8 design is intended to put intelligence oversight upon both
political parties in Congress; it is designed that way by informing the
minority leaders of both the House and Senate as well as the ranking
minority members of the SSCI and HPSCI. Under the concept, the President
cannot conduct an intelligence operation; and the intelligence
community cannot carry out intelligence gathering operations without the
majority and minority parties knowing about it.
The
modern design of this oversight system was done to keep rogue and/or
corrupt intelligence operations from happening. However, as we shared in the preview to this entire discussion, the process was usurped during the Obama era. {GO DEEP}
Former FBI Director James Comey openly admitted to Congress on March 20, 2017,
that the FBI, FBI Counterintelligence Division, DOJ and DOJ-National
Security Division, together with the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence (ODNI) and the CIA, had been conducting independent
investigations of Donald Trump for over a year without informing the
Go8. Comey justified the lack of informing Go8 oversight by saying, “because of the sensitivity of the matter.”
Stupidly,
Congress never pressed James Comey on that issue. The arrogance was
astounding, and the acceptance by Congress was infuriating. However,
that specific example highlighted just how politically corrupt the
system had become. In essence, Team Obama usurped the entire design of
congressional oversight…. and Congress just brushed it off.
Keep in mind, Comey did not say the White House was unaware; in fact he said exactly the opposite, he said, “The White House was informed through the National Security Council,”
(the NSC). The implication, the very direct and specific implication;
the unavoidable implication and James Comey admission that everyone just
brushed aside, was that President Obama’s National Security Advisor,
Susan Rice, was totally informed of the intelligence operation(s)
against Donald Trump. After all, the NSC reports to the National
Security Advisor.
Does the January 20, 2017, Susan Rice memo look different now?
Again, no one saw the immediate issue. What Comey just described on
that March day in 2017 was the total usurpation of the entire reason
the Gang of Eight exists; to eliminate the potential for political
weaponization of the Intelligence Community by the executive branch. The
G08 notifications to the majority and minority are specifically
designed to make sure what James Comey admitted to doing was never
supposed to happen.
Team Obama carried out a political operation
using the intelligence community and the checks-and-balances in the
system were intentionally usurped. This is an indisputable fact.
Worse
still, the entire legislative branch of Congress, which specifically
includes the Republicans that now controlled the House and Senate, did
nothing. They just ignored what was admitted. The usurpation was willfully ignored.
The mechanism of the G08 was bypassed without a twitch of condemnation
or investigation…. because the common enemy was Donald Trump.
This
example highlights the collapse of the system. Obama, the executive
branch, collapsed the system by usurping the process; in essence the
process became the bigger issue and the lack of immediate legislative
branch reaction became evidence of open acceptance. The outcomes of the
usurpation played out over the next four years, Donald J. Trump was
kneecapped and lost his presidency because of it. However, the bigger
issue of the collapse still exists.
The downstream
consequence of the Legislative Branch accepting the Executive Branch
usurpation meant both intelligence committees were compromised.
Additionally, the leadership of both the House and Senate were
complicit. Think about this carefully. The Legislative Branch allowance
of the intelligence usurpation meant the Legislative Branch was now
subservient to the Intelligence Branch.
That’s where we are.
Right now.
That’s where we are.
Term-3 Obama is now back in the White House with Joe Biden.
Term-1 and Term-2 Obama usurped the ‘check and balance‘ within the system and weaponized the intelligence apparatus.
During
Trump’s term that weaponization was covered up by a compliant congress,
and not a single member of the oversight called it out.
Now, Term-3 Obama steps back in to continue the cover up and continue the weaponization.
Hopefully,
you can now see the scale of the problem that surrounds us with
specific citation for what has taken place. What I just explained to you
above is not conspiracy theory, it is admitted fact that anyone can
look upon. Yet….
Have you seen this mentioned anywhere? Have you
seen this called out by anyone in Congress? Have you seen anyone in
media (ally or adversary) call this out? Have you seen any member of the
Judicial Branch stand up and say wait, what is taking place is not
okay? Have you seen a single candidate for elected office point this
out? Have you seen anyone advising a candidate point this out?
This is our current status. It is not deniable. The truth exists regardless of our comfort.
Not
a single person in power will say openly what has taken place. They are
scared of the Fourth Branch. The evidence of what has taken place is
right there in front of our face. The words, actions and activities of
those who participated in this process are not deniable.
There
are only two members of the Gang of Eight who have existed in place
from January 2007 (the real beginning of Obama’s term, two years before
he took office when the Congress flipped). Only two members of the G08 have been consistently in place from January of 2007 to right now, today.
All
the others came and went, but two members of the Gang of Eight have
been part of that failed and collapsed oversight throughout the past 15
years, Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell.
TECHNOLOGY
On
a global scale – the modern intelligence gathering networks are now
dependent on data collection to execute their intelligence missions. In
the digital age nations have been executing various methods to gather
that data. Digital surveillance has replaced other methods of
interception. Those surveillance efforts have resulted in a coalescing
of regional data networks based on historic multi-national
relationships.
We have a recent frame of reference for the “U.S. data collection network” within the NSA. Through the allied process the Five Eyes nations
all rely on the NSA surveillance database (U.K, Australia, Canada, New
Zealand and U.S.) The NSA database provides the digital baseline for
intelligence operations in defense of our allies. The portals into the
NSA database are essentially an assembly of allies in like-minded
ideological connection to the United States.
Unfortunately, there
have been some revelations about the NSA database being used to monitor
our allies, like in the example of Germany and surveillance on Angela
Merkel’s phone. As long as “the good guys” are operating honorably,
allies of the United States can feel confident about having protection
from the NSA surveillance of global digital data. We warn our friends if
we detect something dangerous etc.
The
U.S. has nodes on communication pipelines to intercept and extract
data. We have also launched hundreds, perhaps thousands, of satellites
to conduct surveillance and gather up data. All of this data is fed into
the NSA database where it is monitored (presumably) as a national
security mechanism, and in defense of our allies.
However, what
about data collection or data networks that are outside the NSA
database? What do our enemies do? The NSA database is just one
intelligence operation of digital surveillance amid the entire world,
and we do not allow access by adversaries we are monitoring. So what do
they do? What do our allies do who might not trust the United States due
to past inconsistencies, ie. the Middle East?
The answers to those questions highlight other data collection networks. So a brief review of the major players is needed.
CHINA
China
operates their own database. They, like the NSA, scoop up data for
their system. Like us, China launches satellites and deploys other
electronic data collection methods to download into their database. This
is why the issues of electronic devices manufactured in China becomes
problematic. Part of the Chinese data collection system involves the use
of spyware, hacking and extraction.
Issues with Chinese
communication company Huawei take on an added dimension when you
consider the goal of the Chinese government to conduct surveillance and
assemble a network of data to compete with the United States via the
NSA. Other Chinese methods of surveillance and data-collection are less
subversive, as in the examples of TicTok and WeChat. These are Chinese
social media companies that are scraping data just like the NSA scrapes
data from Facebook, Twitter and other Silicon Valley tech companies. [
Remember, the Intelligence Branch is a public-private partnership. ]
RUSSIA
It
is very likely that Russia operates their own database. We know Russia
launches satellites, just like China and the USA, for the same purposes.
Russia is also very proficient at hacking into other databases and
extracting information to store and utilize in their own network. The
difference between the U.S., China and Russia is likely that Russia
spends more time on the hacking aspect because they do not generate
actual technology systems as rapidly as the U.S. and China.
The
most recent database creation is an outcome of an ally having to take
action because they cannot rely on the ideology of the United States
remaining consistent, as the administrations ping-pong based on
ideology.
SAUDI ARABIA
Yes, in 2016 we
discovered that Saudi Arabia was now operating their own intelligence
data-gathering operation. It would make sense, given the nature of the
Middle East and the constant fluctuations in political support from the
United States. It is a lesson the allied Arab community and Gulf
Cooperation Council learned quickly when President Obama went to Cairo
in 2009 and launched the Islamist Spring (Arab Spring) upon them.
I
have no doubt the creation of the Saudi intelligence network was
specifically because the Obama administration started supporting radical
Islamists within the Muslim Brotherhood, and threw fuel on the fires of
extremism all over the Arab world.
Think about it., What would
you do if you were Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAE,
Jordan, Oman or Yemen and you knew the United States could just trigger
an internal uprising of al-Qaeda, ISIS and the political arm of the
Muslim Brotherhood to seek your destruction?
Without a doubt,
those urgent lessons from 2009, 2010, 2011 triggered the formation of
the Arab Intelligence Network as a network to defend itself with
consistency. They assembled the network and activated it in 2017 as
pictured above.
Israel
Along a similar
outlook to the Arab network, no doubt Israel operates an independent
data collection system as a method of protecting itself from
ever-changing U.S. politics amid a region that is extremely hostile to
its very existence. Like the others, Israel launches proprietary
satellites, and we can be sure they use covert methods to gather
electronic data just like the U.S. and China.
As we have recently seen in the Pegasus story,
Israel creates spyware programs that are able to track and monitor cell
phone communications of targets. The spyware would not work unless
Israel had access to some network where the phone meta-data was actually
stored. So yeah, it makes sense for Israel to operate an independent
intelligence database.
Summary:
As
we understand the United States Intelligence Branch of government as
the superseding entity that controls the internal politics of our
nation, we also must consider that multiple nations have the same issue.
There are major intelligence networks around the world beside the NSA
“Five-Eyes” database. China, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Israel all operate
proprietary databases deploying the same tools and techniques for
assembly.
The geopolitical conflict that has always existed has now shifted into a digital battle-space. The
Intelligence Agencies from these regions are now operating as the
backbone of the government that uses them, and has become dependent on
them. [<- Reread that].
Once you accept the
digital-era intelligence apparatus of China, Russia, Saudi-Arabia, The
United States and Israel, are now the primary national security
mechanisms for stabilization of government; then you accept the
importance of those intelligence operations.
Once you understand
how foundational those modern intelligence operations have become for
the stability and continuity of those governments…… then you begin to
understand just how the United States intelligence community became more
important than the government that created it.
Public Private Partnership –
The modern Fourth Branch of Government is only possible because of a
Public-Private partnership with the intelligence apparatus. You do not
have to take my word for it, the partnership is so brazen they have made
public admissions.
The
biggest names in Big Tech announced in June their partnership with the
Five Eyes intelligence network, ultimately controlled by the NSA, to:
(1) monitor all activity in their platforms; (2) identify extremist
content; (3) look for expressions of Domestic Violent Extremism (DVE);
and then, (4) put the content details into a database where the Five
Eyes intelligence agencies (U.K., U.S., Australia, Canada, New Zealand)
can access it.
Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft are all
partnering with the intelligence apparatus. It might be difficult to
fathom how openly they admit this, but they do. Look at this sentence
in the press release (emphasis mine):
[…] “The Group will use lists from intelligence-sharing group Five Eyes adding URLs and PDFs from more groups, including the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters and neo-Nazis.”
Think
about that sentence structure very carefully. They are “adding to” the
preexisting list…. admitting the group (aka Big Tech) already have
access to the the intelligence-sharing database… and also admitting
there is a preexisting list created by the Five Eyes consortium.
Obviously,
who and what is defined as “extremist content” will be determined by
the Big Tech insiders themselves. This provides a gateway, another
plausible deniability aspect, to cover the Intelligence Branch from any
oversight.
When the Intelligence Branch within government wants to
conduct surveillance and monitor American citizens, they run up against
problems due to the Constitution of the United States. They get around
those legal limitations by sub-contracting the intelligence gathering,
the actual data-mining, and allowing outside parties (contractors) to
have access to the central database.
The government cannot conduct
electronic searches (4th amendment issue) without a warrant; however,
private individuals can search and report back as long as they have
access. What is being admitted is exactly that preexisting partnership.
The difference is that Big Tech will flag the content from within their
platforms, and now a secondary database filled with the extracted
information will be provided openly for the Intelligence Branch to
exploit.
The volume of metadata captured by the NSA has always
been a problem because of the filters needed to make the targeting
useful. There is a lot of noise in collecting all data that makes the
parts you really want to identify more difficult to capture. This new
admission puts a new massive filtration system in the metadata that
circumvents any privacy protections for individuals.
Previously,
the Intelligence Branch worked around the constitutional and unlawful
search issue by using resources that were not in the United States. A
domestic U.S. agency, working on behalf of the U.S. government, cannot
listen on your calls without a warrant. However, if the U.S. agency
sub-contracts to say a Canadian group, or foreign ally, the privacy
invasion is no longer legally restricted by U.S. law.
What
was announced in June 2021 is an alarming admission of a prior
relationship along with open intent to define their domestic political
opposition as extremists.
July 26 (Reuters) –
A counterterrorism organization formed by some of the biggest U.S. tech
companies including Facebook (FB.O) and Microsoft (MSFT.O) is
significantly expanding the types of extremist content shared between
firms in a key database, aiming to crack down on material from white
supremacists and far-right militias, the group told Reuters.
Until
now, the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism’s (GIFCT) database
has focused on videos and images from terrorist groups on a United
Nations list and so has largely consisted of content from Islamist
extremist organizations such as Islamic State, al Qaeda and the Taliban.
Over
the next few months, the group will add attacker manifestos – often
shared by sympathizers after white supremacist violence – and other
publications and links flagged by U.N. initiative Tech Against
Terrorism. It will use lists from intelligence-sharing group Five Eyes, adding URLs and PDFs from more groups, including the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters and neo-Nazis.
The
firms, which include Twitter (TWTR.N) and Alphabet Inc’s (GOOGL.O)
YouTube, share “hashes,” unique numerical representations of original
pieces of content that have been removed from their services. Other
platforms use these to identify the same content on their own sites in
order to review or remove it. (read more)
The
influence of the Intelligence Branch now reaches into our lives, our
personal lives. In the decades before 9/11/01 the intelligence apparatus
intersected with government, influenced government, and undoubtedly
controlled many institutions with it. The legislative oversight function
was weak and growing weaker, but it still existed and could have been
used to keep the IC in check. However, after the events of 9/11/01, the
short-sighted legislative reactions opened the door to allow the
surveillance state to weaponize.
After the Patriot Act was
triggered, not coincidentally only six weeks after 9/11, a slow and
dangerous fuse was lit that ends with the intelligence apparatus being
granted a massive amount of power. The problem with assembled power is
always what happens when a Machiavellian network takes control over that
power and begins the process to weaponize the tools for their own
malicious benefit. That is exactly what the installation of Barack Obama
was all about.
The Obama network took pre-assembled intelligence
weapons we should never have allowed to be created, and turned those
weapons into tools for his radical and fundamental change. The target
was the essential fabric of our nation. Ultimately, this corrupt
political process gave power to create the Fourth Branch of Government,
the Intelligence Branch. From that perspective the fundamental change
was successful.
WHAT NOW?
There is a way
to stop and deconstruct the Intelligence Branch, but it requires some
outside-the-box thinking and reliance on the Constitution as a tool to
radically change one element within government. In the interim, we must
remain focused on the three tiers that we need for success.
Tier One is “tactical civics”
at a local level. Engaged and active citizen participation at the
community, city, town and hamlet level of society. This is what might be
described as grassroots level, school board level; city council level;
county commissioner level.
Tier Two is “extreme federalism”
at a state level. Engaged and active citizen participation through your
State House and State Senate representative. This is state level
assembly and action demands upon the State House, State Senate and State
Governor.
Tier Three the challenge of “federal offices” on a national level {Go Deep}. This is the part where we need President Donald Trump, and his power to confront the issues comes directly from us.
I am confident that ultimately “We The People” will win. How we can execute the solution is more challenging; in the interim, tactical civics and extreme federalism are doable right now, in this next 2024 election cycle.
It
sucks that a UniParty congress extended FISA-702. However, even if the
hail-Mary pass on Monday fails, FISA was still extended for only
two-years.