by Kenneth Timmerman via American Greatness,
Americans
pay little attention to Europe, other than to sneer at the Euro-elites
and bemoan the fecklessness of European leaders.
I am guilty of both sins. Mea culpa.
But I am also aware of the coming existential crisis facing Europe as a whole and the European Union quite specifically.
It comes in several flavors, and all of them are bitter.

First is the shock and embarrassment posed by the influx of 72,000 North African Muslim wannabe migrants into Ceuta, one of two tiny Spanish enclaves in Morocco, just miles away from the Spanish mainland near Gibraltar.
The
inability—or unwillingness—of the Spanish authorities to repulse them
has provoked a Europe-wide reaction, prompting Italy’s center-right
prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, to impose passport controls on visitors
from Spain for the first time since the Schengen accords of 1995 created
a “borderless” European space.
Spain retaliated last week, imposing controls of its own on visitors from Italy.
This
week Meloni teamed up with her center-left Danish counterpart, Mette
Frederiksen, to jointly condemn uncontrolled migration.
“We are both proud of Europe’s Christian cultural heritage and want to protect it,” they said on Monday.
“We expect those who come to our countries and choose to make Europe
their home to respect our values and not seek to impose ways of life on
us that we do not share.”
Meloni drafted a letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen condemning lax EU immigration policies, which was joined by Frederiksen and 21 EU leaders.
Immigration
has been a long-simmering issue since German Chancellor Angela Merkel
opened the floodgates to hundreds of thousands of Syrian “refugees” in
2015. The Ceuta stampede is just the latest chapter.
Fabrice
Leggeri, a Frenchman who was executive director of the EU Border and
Coast Guard Agency from 2015 to 2022, fought tooth and nail to
standardize EU immigration procedures and to transform his bureaucratic
backwater into a real law enforcement agency.
He was stymied by the European Commissioner in charge of Home Affairs, Ylva Johansson of Sweden. “Don’t worry,” she said. “You
don’t need guns and uniforms because migrants come in search of love.
Europe is an aging continent, so whether you like it or not, it is your
job to welcome migrants.”
Next comes EU enlargement.
Standing
at the gates to join the EU’s 27 member states are tiny Montenegro and
Albania. Then comes Iceland, should its citizens approve a resumption of
EU membership talks in an upcoming referendum.
While only
Albania, which is predominantly Muslim, is controversial, their
accession could open the door to membership talks with Ukraine and
Serbia.
Ukraine would require a peace deal with Russia, which
would be less likely should Ukraine be rewarded with EU membership.
Serbia, a Russian ally and gateway to the Russian economy, poses its own
problems.
And finally, there is the whole question of democracy and freedom.
EU
citizens rail incessantly over the often ridiculous regulations enacted
by the unelected bureaucrats of the European Commission that affect
their daily lives.
Many of these are motivated by Europe’s
powerful “Green” parties and lobbyists. Others stem from the left-wing,
anti-capitalist, anti-farmer bias of the Eurocrats.
One
case in point: the reintroduction of wolves onto agricultural lands
where the predators had been eradicated generations ago. Today, the wolf
packs are protected as endangered species even as they devastate sheep
herds from Sweden to southern Italy.
I know farmers who brave the
authorities and secretly hunt down wolves endangering their livelihoods.
They operate as a veritable underground resistance movement,
communicating using coded texts, always watchful of the police.
It’s
a running joke that a young Swedish girl could get gang-raped by Syrian
immigrants, and the police wouldn’t lift a finger. But if a farmer got
caught killing a wolf, they would exhaust every investigative and
prosecutorial resource to put him away for years.
European
Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is certainly aware of the
dissenters among the European Parliament, mainly from the populist or
center-right parties.
But instead of accommodating them,
she is attempting to reinforce the powers of the unelected Commission by
doing away with the existing rule of unanimity when it comes to foreign
policy decisions.
For years, Hungarian leader Viktor
Orbán vetoed European Commission policies that invariably criticized
Israel, supported the Palestinians, or criticized the United States.
His election loss only emboldened Ms. von der Leyen, who frequently clashed with Orbán personally and in public.
Now
she wants to allow a simple majority of member states to approve
foreign policy dictates, a shift that would essentially create the
“tyranny of the majority” America’s founders warned about 250 years ago.
Former
Belgian Prime Minister and European Council President Charles Michel is
scathing in his criticism of von der Leyen. “Today, the Commission is
trying to take control. That’s not in line with the [EU] treaty,” he told a Belgian magazine in April. “There is super authoritarian governance.”
Much
but not all of those new powers came during the COVID years and in
response to the war in Ukraine. But the anti-democratic gene runs deep
among the Eurocrats.
Former Czech President and Prime Minister
Václav Klaus lived through decades of Soviet Communism imposed on his
country after World War II. Already in 2009, he was warning about the lack of democratic institutions within the EU.
“The
present decision-making system of the European Union is different from a
classic parliamentary democracy, tested and proven by history… Here,
only one single alternative is being promoted, and those who dare think
about a different option are labelled as enemies of European
integration.
“Not so long ago, in our part of Europe we lived in a
political system that permitted no alternatives and therefore also no
parliamentary opposition. It was through this experience that we learned
the bitter lesson that with no opposition, there is no freedom. That is
why political alternatives must exist.”
Europe and the EU are at a crossroads.
Down
one road, Europe will become increasingly authoritarian and
increasingly centralized, while its founding cultures will be
increasingly marginalized and demeaned in favor of Muslim immigration
and multiculturalism. These were the faults that led to Brexit,
Britain’s withdrawal from the EU.
Down another road,
Europe will return to its roots, celebrate its diverse cultures and its
Christian and Jewish heritage, and honor the wishes of its member states
and their people.
Count me skeptical, but I don’t see that democratic alternative on the horizon, at least not yet.