by Jeff Thomas via InternationalMan.com,
It will be no secret to readers that more and more people are coming to the realization that the economic, political, and social problems in the world are becoming quite pronounced
– worse than at any other point in their lifetimes. Increasingly, such
people are turning to publications such as this one to find answers as
to: (a) where it will all end; and (b) how they can personally avoid (or
at least minimize) the damage to themselves, personally.
Publications
such as this one do their best to inform people as to how they may
positively affect their future; however, in order for people to make
informed choices, they must first understand the nature of their
situation.
One of
the misperceptions that seems to be almost universal is that, although
things are bad, there is no particular reason why, if the right people
were in charge, the situation could not simply reverse itself and all
would be well again.
This is not at all the case.
At
the root of the misunderstanding is the common perception that a
country’s progress (economically and politically) is rather like a sine
wave, endlessly oscillating. Booms and busts come and go with
regularity. If it were as simple as this, the goal for all concerned
right now would be to remain as liquid as possible and to ride out the
current situation until we reach the next upward wave, which surely
could take place if the right people are at the helm.
At such
times, the heat that revolves around elections becomes considerable, as
people take up sides over whether the liberal or conservative candidate
“has the answer.”
However, if we step well back from the situation
and examine which government philosophy has been the most successful,
we would have to admit that, regardless of the outcome of elections, the
decline has continued unabated. In fact, nearly all the countries of
the First World are now in a more dire condition that at any time in
living memory. Whatever is taking place, it is not a repetitive sine
wave; and we should not rest our hopes on the possibility that “our guy”
will be elected and carry us through to the next upswing.
If we step back further, we note that historically this is not a new condition. The present situation has played itself out over the millennia.
Countries come to prominence, flourish for a time, then decay for
sometimes long periods before rising again, if ever. Countries,
particularly democracies, tend to have a lifespan.
Typically, they follow this pattern:
From Bondage to Moral Certitude
From Moral Certitude to Great Courage
From Great Courage to Liberty
From Liberty to Abundance
From Abundance to Selfishness
From Selfishness to Complacency
From Complacency to Apathy
From Apathy to Dependency <--You are here...
From Dependency to Bondage
The empires of old, such as the Roman Empire and the Athenian Republic, followed this pattern. Rome
took roughly 500 years to complete the entire transition (or longer,
depending upon interpretations). Later, others, such as Spain, Holland,
and the UK took their turns, each taking a bit less time to complete the
pattern. The US is the present holder of the title of “Greatest
Empire.” It has taken about 250 years to travel from its point of Moral
Certitude to its present state of Apathy/Dependency.
The reader can perform his own appraisals of when the US passed through each of the above stages.
He
may even wish to add one or two of his own mini-stages, or retitle some
stages to his liking. Still, it is likely that he will agree that this
pattern has been followed.
What is striking about the pattern is that it is based upon human nature.
For the majority of people in any country, there is a brief time (Great
Courage to Liberty) when human frustration gives way to dramatic
change. This is followed by natural and even predictable periods that
often take a generation or two to fully play out, until they morph into
the next stage. But they are logical, as they follow a path of human
nature.
What is significant is that the pattern remains the same; and it represents the lifetime of
a country. Some may take longer than others to travel from one stage to
the other, but the pattern remains over the entire transition.
But
all the above is academic. To have worth, the recognition of the
premise that a country has a lifetime must be related to the present
situation.
If we recognize that the present Empire has indeed passed through the various stages and is now in the Apathy/Dependency stage,
we would have to consider that the final stage of Bondage is now on the
horizon. If we are prepared to take a major step back from our present
standpoint to assess both the past and future, we will conclude that no
election – in the US or any other country – will reverse the inexorable
progress of governments to dominate the electorate. Nor will it reverse
the electorate’s slow but steady compliance over generations. This
process is as perennial as the grass. Those who seek to dominate will always keep up the pressure for ever-greater control, and the average citizen will always hope for an easier life if he gives in “just one more time” to the powers that be.
Judge
Andrew Napolitano is fond of referring of the American government as a
“giant predatory bird, with a right wing and a left wing.” This
is an excellent analogy that does not only apply to the US. It can be
applied to most every “democracy” in the world. Elections serve as
useful illusions to provide hope for the populace that they, in some
way, contribute to their own destiny. They therefore follow the election
process to such a degree that, in those countries where the election
scam is most prominent, the candidates actually begin campaigning a year
or more before their terms are complete, rather than focus on the
running of the country.
No matter which candidate wins, the pattern continues to play itself out.
And
so, the question bears asking again. Why, if countries do pass through a
natural progression of stages, would anyone hold on to the thin sliver
of hope that any election in any country would somehow reverse the
entire process, as has never occurred in the past?
The answer, it
would seem, is that once this vain hope is given up, all that is left is
the acceptance that the final stage of development is on the way. And
to accept such a dark inevitability is a prospect that not even a
Russian novelist could bear.
There will certainly be those
who say, “I choose to be hopeful,” and by doing so will in essence seal
their fate. On the other hand, those who do take the difficult decision
to stare down the dark road that lies ahead must make a choice – and it
is in that choice that the real hope lies.
In
the nineteenth century, Europe was in tatters. Old, bloated kingdoms
were either falling into decay or being toppled by revolution. Often the
leaders of those revolutions were just as sociopathic as many of our
modern-day leaders (although less subtle in their methods of control).
Back then, the majority of citizens in every country put their heads
down and hoped that “maybe it will get better.” However, a few people
actually took the courageous step to pull up stakes and sail across the
water to a new, more promising country. The stories of success that
found their way back to Europe, in time, resulted in a flood of people
who made the move. The very ambition that they created within themselves
proved to be the foundation of the American transition “from Liberty to
Abundance.”
Today, the trickle of people has begun again. As
before, many people are quietly exiting Europe, but this time, the US is
not the destination. In fact, a flow has also begun from that country.
But
there is a difference this time. So far, the waves of “refugees” have
not yet filled the ships, although that may yet happen. For now, what is
occurring is the quiet exit of those people who still retain some level
of wealth and are seeking to both retain that wealth and to gain
greater freedom for the future. This, in a sense, is the “golden time,”
when the welcome mat is still out in many desirable destinations; when
the first to arrive will have the greatest opportunity. Later, if the
predictable flood of expatriation occurs, the welcome mats may be
withdrawn.
