In 1949 George Orwell published his science fiction novel "1984". A world in which a all powerful police state controls information and the life of its citizens through propaganda and slogans such as "War is Peace" or "Freedom is Slavery". The inspiration to the world of Orwell was directly taken from Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia, and although it has taken a little longer than anticipated, here we are in 2020, riding the train towards... 1984! (Don't believe it? Here's Australia, with its slogan and a jingle to go with it. “Staying Apart Keeps Us Together”)
We have made much progress in propaganda science over the last 100 years since the early days of Edward Bernays. In particular, we learned not to call it propaganda. We also learned that a dose of "Brave New World" rose tinted glasses was most useful since a large part of propaganda is self delusion. Finally the science was honed in the real cut throat world of advertising.
Taking control of the media was a little more difficult than it should have been as the technology moved from Radio to Television and finally to the Internet, but nothing that concentration of power and capital could not achieve. The first wave was the "War on Drugs" which was born with the Vietnam conflict in the late 1960s and dragged on for a few decades, to be replaced by the war on terror in September 2001. One elusive enemy replacing another one.
But what George Orwell did not anticipate is that the effectiveness of the police state could be enforced without the police aspect by implementing a tight control of information. Concentration of the media was already a fact but the soft aspect of cancelling unwanted information was a little more difficult to put in place. It started two years ago when we were told that Neo-nazi ideology was so toxic that it could not be permitted to exist. An argument to which few people objected except to ask where exactly would such censorship stop. The answer came soon after when "extremist" content was extended to "offensive" content and finally to any content contradicting the official version. The only amazing feat is that it took only two years to destroy plurality of thoughts.
So much so that today hundreds of doctors speaking out again the manipulation that Covid-19 has become are silenced without noise. The scientific debate itself has been extinguished on our watch!
The forces against openness, democracy and science are such that I have no illusion that they can be defeated in the short term. Decadence is not an event but a process against which it is no use fighting. Would my voice get any traction, it would be silenced promptly.
Still, for the sake of science, here's what hundreds of doctors are telling us about Covid-19...
These doctors and scientists are being heavily censored across all social media platforms, and those who write about them are experiencing the same. Many of the claims these doctors make have been ‘debunked’ by mainstream media, federal health regulatory agencies and ‘fact-checkers’ that are patrolling the internet. Any information that does not come from the (WHO) is not considered reliable, truthful or accurate, and that would include the information presented in this article and information shared by these experts in the field. People are being encouraged to visit the WHO’s website for real and accurate information about COVID-19 instead of listening to doctors and scientists who oppose the narrative of these health authorities.
What Happened: More than 500 German doctors & scientists have signed on as representatives of an organization called “Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss.” Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss stands for the “Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee and was established to investigate all things that pertain to the new coronavirus such as the severity of the virus, and whether or not the actions taken by governments around the world, and in this case the German government, are justified and not causing more harm than good.
As the Corona-Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, we will investigate why these restrictive measures were imposed upon us in our country as part of COVID-19, why people are suffering now and whether there is proportionality of the measures to this disease caused by the SARS-COV-2 virus. We have serious doubts that these measures are proportionate. This needs to be examined, and since the parliaments – neither the opposition parties nor the ruling parties – have not convened a committee and it is not even planned, it is high time that we took this into our own hands. We will invite and hear experts here in the Corona speaker group. These are experts from all areas of life: Medicine, social affairs, law, economics and many more. (source)
You can access the full english transcripts on the organizations website if interested.
This group has been giving multiple conferences in Germany, in one of the most recent, Dr. Heiko Schöning, one of the organizations leaders, stated that “We have a lot of evidence that it (the new coronavirus) is a fake story all over the world.” To put it in context, he wasn’t referring to the virus being fake, but simply that it’s no more dangerous than the seasonal flu (or just as dangerous) and that there is no justification for the measures being taken to combat it.
I also think it’s important to mention that a report published in the British Medical Journal has suggested that quarantine measures in the United Kingdom as a result of the new coronavirus may have already killed more UK seniors than the coronavirus has during the peak of the virus.
Below is a press conference held by representatives of the group that took place last month, you can find more important information below that.
Why This Is Important: It can be confusing for many people to see so many doctors and many of the world’s most renowned scientists and infectious disease experts oppose so much information that is coming from the WHO and global governments.
Many scientists and doctors in North America are also expressing the same sentiments. For example, The Physicians For Informed Consent (PIC) recently published a report titled “Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) Compares COVID-19 to Previous Seasonal and Pandemic Flu Periods.” According to them, the infection/fatality rate of COVID-19 is 0.26%. You can read more about that and access their resources and reasoning here.
John P. A. Ioannidis, a professor of medicine and epidemiology at Stanford University has said that the infection fatality rate “is close to 0 percent” for people under the age of 45 years old. You can read more about that here. He and several other academics from the Stanford School of Medicine suggest that COVID-19 has a similar infection fatality rate as seasonal influenza, and published their reasoning in a study last month. You can find that study and read more about that story here.
Michael Levitt, a Biophysicist and a professor of structural biology at Stanford University criticized the WHO as well as Facebook for censoring different information and informed perspectives regarding the Coronavirus and has claimed that, with regards to lockdown measures, that “the level of stupidity going on here is amazing.” You can read more about this here.
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a specialist in microbiology and one of the most cited research scientists in German history is also part of Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee mentioned above and has also expressed the same thing, multiple times early on in the pandemic all the way up to today.
Implementation of the current draconian measures that are so extremely restrict fundamental rights can only be justified if there is reason to fear that a truly, exceptionally dangerous virus is threatening us. Do any scientifically sound data exist to support this contention for COVID-19? I assert that the answer is simply, no. – Bhakdi. You can read more about him here.
Below are some interesting statistics from Canada. (source)
The Takeaway
We have to ask ourselves, why are so many experts in the field being completely censored. Why is there so much information being shared that completely contradicts the narrative of our federal health regulatory agencies and organizations like the WHO? Why are these experts being heavily censored, and why are alternative media platforms being censored, punished and demonetized for sharing such information? Is there a battle for our perception happening right now? Is our consciousness being manipulated? Why is there so much conflicting information if everything is crystal clear? Why are alternative treatments that have shown tremendous amounts of success being completely ignored and ridiculed? What’s going on here, and how much power do governments have when they are able to silence the voice of so many people? Should we not be examining information openly, transparently, and together?
No comments:
Post a Comment