Friday, March 3, 2023

Stillbirths nearly doubled in Singapore, one of the world’s most mRNA vaccinated countries, in 2022

  As expected, we are starting to see the numbers and consequences of the Covid vaccine. Singapore this time, where live births are down 10% in 2022. In Japan, it was just announced last week that live births were down 9% in 2022. These are not small numbers.

  Better, the 1% difference correspond almost exactly to the difference in vaccination rates in Singapore and Japan! What an amazing coincidence! Curious minds would inquire about correlation...

Guest Post by Alex Berenson

Meanwhile, live births plunged. The changes began in March 2022, EXACTLY nine months after Singapore mass vaccinated people of childbearing age

For two years, mRNA Covid vaccine skeptics have raised questions about whether the shots might damage fertility.

mRNA jabs alter menstrual cycles in some women. An Israeli study last June showed that sperm production falls after the Pfizer shot.

Worse, births are falling fast in many mRNA countries. The trend predates the shots, but in some countries it accelerated nine months after the widespread rollout of the jabs to women of childbearing age.

Still, data have not supported the worst fear of mRNA skeptics – a marked rise in late-term deaths or stillborn babies.

Until now.

The Asian city-state of Singapore is small, wealthy, regimented, and very good at collecting and publishing data. Last week, it released full-year 2022 data on deaths, live births, and stillbirths.

Here’s the chart on stillbirths. Official Singaporean government data, nothing less or more. The numbers speak for themselves:

(SOURCE – Table 10 of the Singapore Demographic Bulletin, Q4 2022, which you can download at the link)

73 stillbirths in 2019.

78 in 2020.

78 in 2021.

133 in 2022.

Looks like about a 70 percent jump annual, after three years in which the figures remained essentially flat.

The reality is even worse.

Singapore puts out these reports each quarter. In the first quarter of 2022, it reported only 13 stillbirths, compared to 18 in 2021.

Thus, in April through December 2022, stillbirths doubled to 120 – from 60 during the same period a year before.

This increase in stillbirths from April through December did NOT occur because of a rise in births.

In fact, the opposite is true.

Births in Singapore fell 10 percent in the final three quarters of 2022, a marked shift from the January-March period, when they rose about 1 percent (due entirely to increases in January and Feburary). The decline has not eased, either; births fell 15 percent in December.

In other words, stillbirths doubled from April to December even as live births fell, reversing the early 2022 pattern.

This trend is particularly striking because of what happened nine months before the decline began, in early summer 2021.

Singapore carried out its Covid vaccinations as quickly and efficiently as it does everything.

As this chart demonstrates, nearly every Singaporean adult between 20-39 – childbearing age, essentially – received his or her first Covid vaccine jab in June and July 2021. (More than 98 percent of the jabs Singapore gave were mRNAs, though Chinese inactivated virus vaccines were privately available.)

The story here is simple.

And worrying.

In March 2022, precisely nine months after mass mRNA vaccinations of women of childbearing age began – births in Singapore plunged, while stillbirths soared.

Wednesday, March 1, 2023

mRNAs jabs may have caused tens of millions of serious new health problems worldwide, a huge peer-reviewed study shows

  As expected, the consequences of the Covid vaccine on health are widespread. The reason may be (must be) due to the effects of the vaccine on the immune system combined with predispositions in the affected population.

Guest Post by Alex Berenson

Covid vaccines are linked to a 20 percent rise in new diagnoses for at least three months after vaccination; a second report finds even higher risks for people with preexisting autoimmune problems

Adults have sharply higher risks of being diagnosed with heart, skin, and psychiatric conditions for at least 90 days after they receive Covid jabs, a peer-reviewed study of almost 300,000 people in California has shown.

The researchers examined new diagnoses given to the same people before and after they were vaccinated to see whether the shots changed the risk of new health problems.

They found that people were about 21 percent more likely to receive a new diagnosis in the three months after a shot, compared to the three months before. With almost 240 million American adults jabbed, the rise translates into millions of extra new medical problems found in the months after vaccination, and tens of millions worldwide.

Serious conditions such as hypertension were about 25 percent more likely to be diagnosed in the three months following a shot than the three months before, the researchers found.

Depression, eczema, diabetes, and cellulitis were 10 to 20 percent more likely.

Myocarditis diagnoses had the highest additional risk. They were about 2.6 times as likely overall, with an even higher risk in men. Myocarditis is a known side effect of the mRNAs, so the fact it had a particularly high rate of extra diagnoses provides strong evidence that the signal the researchers found was real.

Overall, the researchers reported that the 284,000 Covid-vaccinated adults they examined received almost 6,000 additional diagnoses of health conditions in the 90 days after being jabbed compared to the 90 days before.

With about 237 million American adults vaccinated, that estimate would translate into about 5 million extra diagnoses for problems like diabetes in the three months following the shots. Worldwide, the number could be up to 25 million.

In the chart below, the blue column is the risk someone will be diagnosed with a new condition following vaccination, compared to the risk before.

For example, about 2,560 out of the 284,000 people were diagnosed with hypertension up to three months after vaccination, compared to 2,080 of the same people up to three months before. The extra 480 cases translated into a 23 percent higher risk of hypertension following vaccination. Because the number of cases was so high, the risk was highly statistically significant, meaning the finding probably was not due to chance.

(Apologies for the laptop screenshot)

SOURCE

The study’s researchers are a group from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, a big hospital system in Los Angeles. Their findings were published in Nature Cardiovascular Research in December. But the paper has received almost no attention, a common response to reports that raise questions about the safety of the vaccines.

The researchers also noted that in a smaller sample of adults infected with Covid, new diagnoses for health conditions rose about 40 percent in the three months after infection compared to the three months before.

That fact should come as no surprise. Viral infections are both a marker for and a potential cause of ill-health. Further, people are likely visit their doctors both while they are sick with Covid and shortly after they recover. Those contacts provide a chance for them to receive new diagnoses.

In contrast, people generally receive Covid shots at clinics or pharmacies, not from their doctors, so the chance that the process of receiving a new shot will lead to a diagnosis is minimal.

Thus, if Covid jabs are not harmful, mass vaccinations should not impact the timing of illnesses or their diagnoses. New diagnoses should be scattered randomly before and after the shots.

In fact, people who are feeling ill when they are due for a vaccination may be likely to delay the jab and go to a physician instead. They may then receive a diagnosis that would be counted as occurring before the shot, not after.

This “healthy vaccinee bias” should mean that new illness diagnoses are less likely for a few days after vaccination than before, even if the shots have no effect. As a result, the 20 percent increase in common diagnoses after vaccination is particularly stunning.

Meanwhile, researchers in Hong Kong independently found an even sharper increase in autoimmune “flares” following Covid shots.

The risk of new episodes of lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, and other serious autoimmune conditions roughly doubled following the shots in a group of 562 patients with those conditions they followed, compared to 1,055 who did not. The paper was published February 17 in the Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology.

SOURCE

But not all vaccines carried the autoimmune risk.

Only mRNA shots did. Chinese-style inactivated virus vaccines did not. Hong Kong used both types of jabs, making a direct comparison possible. The researchers suggested that the mRNA shots cause the flares by stimulating a specific immune receptor that causes the release of inflammatory cytokines.

“Risk-benefit considerations in patients with active rheumatic disease may favor inactivated virus rather than mRNA vaccines to avoid the risk of flare-ups of any severity,” the researchers wrote.

Americans do not have that option, as the United States does not allow the use of Chinese inactivated Covid vaccines.

Tucker: This is an outrage (The Truth about Wuhan.) (Video - 21')

  Like it or not, Tucker Carlson is the only one on US media to tell the truth about the origin of the Corona Virus. Everybody else has been cancelled from social media or TV, including the greatest virologists in the country, as conspiracy theorists. 

  The reason as we now know is because the people who "own the science" like Dr Fauci were implicated in dangerous genetic manipulations "gain of function" and in connivance with political leaders also happened to control the media.   

  As the CIA Director, William J. Casey, said some time ago, “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” We're almost there!


 

Tuesday, February 28, 2023

Deaths jumped 8.9% in Japan in 2022 to almost double birth total

 Unbelievable 9% jump in death in japan in 2022. This being the Nikkei, they did not mentioned the vaccine of course. Just aging society and latest Covid wave. Worse,  the birth rate is also plummeting. So much so that Japan is 11 years ahead of schedule with its population curve. As mentioned earlier, believe whatever or whoever you want but clearly the numbers do not lie!

  Link to Nikkei article

 Record 1.58m people died, showing impact of aging population, COVID

Total deaths in Japan jumped nearly 9% in 2022 from the previous year, underscoring the severe impact of the aging population and the COVID pandemic.

A record 1,582,033 people, including foreigners living in Japan and Japanese citizens living abroad, died last year, according to preliminary data released by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare on Tuesday. The pace of the rise in deaths jumped from 4.9% in 2021 to 8.9%.

A large number of people died after being infected with COVID -- Japan has reported about 72,000 pandemic-related deaths since the onset of the disease in early 2020. But the underlying reason is the graying of society, with a government estimate released last month showing that 29% of the population is now 65 years old or older.

The number of deaths was nearly double that of births. The number of newborns fell 5.1% to 799,728 in 2022, with the pace of decline accelerating from 3.4% the previous year. This stems from the shrinking number of Japanese of childbearing age and their declining propensity to have children.

The decline in births came 11 years earlier than previously forecast. A 2017 study by the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research predicted that births, including those to foreign parents, would drop below 800,000 in 2033.

In addition to demographic momentum, surveys show the high cost of raising children, including education, weighing on young couples, adding to the decline in births. The natural decline (total deaths minus total births) of 782,305 people during 2022 was also the highest on record.

Tuesday's statistics come as the Japanese government plans to promote reforms to the workplace and expand economic and social support measures aimed at encouraging young people to marry and have children.

Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, in a January speech to parliament, described Japan as "on the brink" of being unable to maintain its social functions, emphasizing that the need to address the issue is "a challenge that cannot be postponed."

The falling birthrate in Japan is mirrored elsewhere in East Asia. Last week, South Korea announced that the number of newborns in the country fell 4.4% to 249,000 in 2022. Likewise, official figures released in January revealed that China's births fell nearly 10% to 9.56 million.

Declining births generally lead to future shortages of labor and taxpayers, hurting both the economy and public finances.

However, the number of marriages in Japan rose for the first time in three years last year, climbing 1.1% to 519,823, as couples that had put off tying the knot in 2020 and 2021 due to the pandemic, got married.

Monday, February 27, 2023

The Fed's Biggest Fear Is "Complete Economic Collapse" - Peter Schiff Warns "You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet"

  Short of a nuclear war in the coming months, the risk is of a complete economic collapse in a year or two thanks to rising interests rates.

  The risk of war is a recent occurrence and can still be adverted but economic collapse is decades in the making and will crush our society as certainly as night follows day. The unimaginable amount of debt we have created since the 2WW must and will be purged. The only question is when and how painful it will be.   

Via Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com,

Money manager and economist Peter Schiff said in October the Federal Reserve “could NOT win the fight on inflation by raising interest rates.” 

As inflation just turned up anew, it looks like he was right—again. 

Schiff explains, “Based on the recent data we got... the inflation curve has bent back up."

" The months of declining inflation are in the rearview mirror.  Now, we are going to see accelerating inflation... and I think before the year is over, we are going to take out that 9% inflation high last year in year over year CPI (Consumer price Index)...and what that is going to show is what the Fed has done thus far in its inflation fight is completely ineffective. 

If the Fed is serious about fighting inflation, and I do not believe it is, it’s going to have to fight a lot harder than it has.  Interest rates need to go up much higher than anybody thinks, but that alone is not going to do the trick.  We also have to see a big contraction in consumer credit and lending standards rising so consumers can’t keep spending...

Consumers are running up credit card debt.  That is inflationary.  That is an expansion of the supply of credit.”

It gets worse when the Fed has to save the economy again.  Schiff predicts,

I think the Fed is going to have to throw in the towel on the inflation fight because it will be fighting something it fears more, which is a complete economic collapse...

The federal government may be legitimately forced to cut Medicare and Social Security instead of illegitimately cutting it through inflation....

We have this collapsing standard of living, but think about it as a tax.  This is what Americans are paying.  This is the price of big government. . . .

Higher prices are the price we pay for big government, and inflation is a tax.  Instead of raising our taxes, they are just printing money, and that devalues the money we have.”

What is the answer?  Schiff says, “We have to let the phony economy collapse so we can build a real economy on the rubble of this economic house of cards.”

There are going to be lots of losers in the coming collapse.  Schiff says,

People are going to suffer the consequences of this experiment gone bad. . . . We know how this experiment is going to end. 

They are not doing anything that Zimbabwe didn’t try, or Argentina didn’t try or the Weimar Republic.  They didn’t reinvent inflation.  It’s the same old thing.”

As a result, Schiff predicts big losses in many stocks (but not all), bonds and bank deposits.  Schiff contends, “They can’t cover the deposits at the FDIC. .."

"They have to acknowledge that the FDIC is bankrupt and people are going to lose money at a bank.  The losses are going to dwarf those in the Great Depression because we have a far more leveraged system now thanks to government intervention.

Schiff says he also likes gold and silver as a core investment and thinks they both go way up in price in a world where the dollar is eaten up by inflation.

In closing, Schiff says, “We already have inflation.  So, prepare for the consequences of inflation."

" It is going to raise prices, but it is also a massive transfer of wealth.  You have to position yourself to be a winner and not a loser. . . .Creditors are going to get wiped out.  People think they are playing it safe in a bond portfolio.  Look how bad bonds did last year.  It was the worst year in history, and you ain’t seen nothing yet.

Scott Adams' 'Canceled Dilbert' Controversy

  Although in the broader scheme of things this should be little more than a footnote, the fact that Elon Musk felt the urge to mention it on Twitter tells us that there is more about this than meets the eye.

  Dilbert has been around for over 20 years poking fun at the culture of the modern office and the cubicle. Stereotyping people and situations as it should since the purpose is for everyone to recognize their own office and colleagues. It has done this quite successfully although eventually it was obvious that sooner or later if would fall fool of the cancel culture. That fateful day of reckoning has arrived for Dilbert. But make no mistake, if you dare voice anything whatsoever at odd with the woke crowd consensus, eventually you turn will come...
 
For those who still want to follow Dilbert:
https://dilbert.com/
 

Update (1300ET): Shortly after the coordinated cancellation of 'Dilbert' cartoons from numerous media outlets, Elon Musk responded on Twitter to the media's clear bias in reporting the events.

In the early hours of Sunday morning, Musk replied to tweet summarizing the debacle around Adams' comments: "MSM verdict: Adams is a racist, but not the 20 million black people who thinks it’s not OK to be white."

A little later, Musk followed with more color:

One thing is for sure, none of this would have even been allowable discourse before Musk took over Twitter.

*  *  *

Hundreds of newspapers will no longer carry the long-running "Dilbert" office cartoon after creator Scott Adams said white people should "stay the fuck away" from blacks, a demographic he called a "hate group."  

Those remarks in a recent episode of his "Real Coffee with Scott Adams" podcast came after he shared the unsettling results of a Rasmussen poll. When asked if they agree with the statement "It's ok to be white," 26% of blacks disagreed and 21% weren't sure. 

In addition to the USA Today Network -- which includes the Arizona Republic, St. Augustine Record, Courier-Journal (KY), Austin American-Statesman and hundreds more -- the Washington Post, Los Angeles TimesSan Antonio Express-News, Philadelphia Inquirer, Chicago Tribune and Cleveland Plain Dealer were among other individual papers racing to drop Adams like a hot potato

"By Monday, I should be mostly canceled," said Adams on his YouTube channel. "So most of my income will be gone by next week. My reputation for the rest of my life is destroyed. You can't come back from this."

Adams put forward a seemingly paradoxical attempt to clarify his intended message, saying:

  • "Everyone should be treated as an individual"    and
  • "You should also avoid any group that doesn't respect you, even if there are people within the group who are fine" 

As they dropped Dilbert, newspapers issued statements condemning Adams. John Hiner, VP of content for Michigan's MLive Media, said the group has "zero tolerance for racism. And we certainly will not spend our money supporting purveyors of it." 

As is typically the case with cancellations, Hiner chose not to provide details of Adams' remarks, and also told readers not to research them and make their own judgments: "I will not characterize Adams’ racist views or even provide a link to the video....My advice: Save yourself the poison." 

ZeroHedge is more respectful of its readership, so here are some key excerpts of the segment that triggered a cancellation wave that's sure to grow exponentially larger in the coming hours and days: 

"Add 'em together: That is 47% of black respondents who were not willing to say it's ok to be white...

As you know, I've been identifying as black for a while -- years now -- 'cause I like to be on the winning team and I like to help. I always thought, well if you help the black community, that's sort of the biggest lever. You know, you can find the biggest benefit...So I thought, well, that's the hardest thing and the biggest benefit, so I'd like to focus a lot of my life resources in helping black Americans -- so much so that I started identifying as black to just be to be on the team I was helping.

But it turns out that nearly half of that team doesn't think I'm ok to be white...I have to say, this is the first political poll that's ever changed my activities...As of today, I'm going to re-identify as white, because I don't want to be a member of a hate group. I've accidentally joined a hate group. If nearly half of all blacks are not ok with white people -- according to this poll, not according to me -- that's a hate group...and I don't want to have anything to do with it. 

And I would say, based on the current way things are going, the best advice I would give to white people is to get the hell away from black people. Just get the fuck away. Wherever you have to go, just get away.

There's no fixing this...I think it makes no sense whatsoever as a white citizen of America to try to help black citizens anymore...I'm gonna back off from being helpful to black America, because it doesn't seem like it pays off. I've been doing it all my life, and the only outcome is I get called a racist...It makes no sense to help black Americans if you're white. It's over. Don't even think it's worth trying. Totally not trying.

We should be friendly. Like, I'm not saying start a war or do anything bad...I'm just saying get away." 

The Plan to Wreck America

 

   Why is our reality looking more and more like the worst possible outcome of a disaster movie? 

  In October 2019, the Repo market was on the verge of blowing up. Two months later out of the blue came the Covid-19 virus for which amazingly a response was already prepared. The shock and awe part of the program was mostly to divert our attention. But the most important part, by far, were the trillions of dollars unleashed to prevent a systemic crash.

  Mission accomplished although all this money could only buy a few years at most. Now interest rates are rising again and soon the day of reckoning will be upon us... Less a providential war justifies whatever needs to be justified. No wonder there is an obvious lack of will in the West to negotiate... There is absolutely nothing to negotiate about Ukraine. The outcome of the war is irrelevant since the purpose is escalation. What could go wrong?

Guest Post by Mike Whitney

In America, we have an oligarch problem, and it’s much bigger than the oligarch problem that Putin faced when he became president in 2000. The entire West is now in the grips of billionaire elites who have a stranglehold on the media, the political establishment and all of our important institutions. In recent years we have seen these oligarchs expand their influence from markets, finance and trade to politics, social issues and even public health. The impact this group has had on these other areas of interest, has been nothing short of breathtaking. Establishment elites and their media not only stood foursquare behind Russiagate, the Trump impeachment, the BLM riots and the January 6 fiasco, they also had a hand in the Covid hysteria and the host of repressive measures that were imposed in the name of public health. What we’d like to know is to what extent this group is actively involved in the shaping of other events that are aimed at transforming the American Republic into a more authoritarian system?

In other words, are the mandated injections, the forced lockdowns, the aggressive government-implemented censorship, the dubious presidential elections, the burning of food processing plants, the derailing of trains, the attacks on the power grid, the BLM-Antifa riots, the drag queen shows for schoolchildren, the maniacal focus on gender issues, and glitzy public show-trials merely random incidents occurring spontaneously during a period of great social change or are they, in fact, evidence of a stealthily orchestrated operation conducted by agents of the state acting on behalf of their elite benefactors? We already know that the FBI, the DOJ and the intel agencies were directly involved in Russiagate –which was a covert attack on the sitting president of the United States. So, the question is not “whether” these agencies are actively involved in other acts of treachery but, rather, to what extent these acts impact the lives or ordinary Americans, our politics and the country? But before we answer that question, take a look at this quote from from a recent interview by Colonel Douglas MacGregor:

I was reading a document that was authored by George Soros over 10 years ago in which he talks specifically about this all-out war that would ultimately come against Russia because he said this ‘was the last nationalist state that rests on a foundation of orthodox christian culture with Russian identity at its core. That has to be removed. So I think that the people who are in charge in the west and the people in charge in Washington think they have successfully destroyed the identities of the European and American peoples, that we have no sense of ourselves, our borders are undefended, we present no resistance to the incoming migrants from the developing world who essentially roll over us as though we owe them a living and that our laws do not count. Thus, far I would say that is an accurate evaluation of what we’ve been doing. And I think that’s a great victory for George Soros and the globalists, the anti-nationalists; those who want open borders what they call it an “Open Society” because you end up with nothing, an amorphous mass of people struggling to survive who are reduced to the lowest levels of subsistence … (Soros) even goes so far as to talk about how useful it would be if it was east Europeans whose lives were expended in this process and not west Europeans who simply won’t take the casualties. This is not a minor matter. This is the kind of thinking that is so destructive and so evil, in my judgement, that that’s what we’re really dealing with in our own countries and I think Putin recognizes that.” (Douglas Macgregor – A Huge Offensive”, You Tube;, 11:20 minute)

The reason I transcribed this comment from MacGregor was because it sums up the perceptions of a great many people who see things the same way. It expresses the hatred that globalist billionaires have toward Christians and patriots, both of which they see as obstacles to their goal of a borderless one-world government. MacGregor discusses this phenom in relation to Russia which Soros sees as “the last nationalist state that rests on a foundation of orthodox Christian culture with Russian identity at its core.” But the same rule could be applied to the January 6 protestors, could it not? Isn’t that the real reason the protestors were rounded up and thrown into the Washington gulag. After all, everyone knows there was no “insurrection” nor were there any “white supremacists”. The protestors were locked up because they’re nationalists (patriots) which are the natural enemy of the globalists. The MacGregor quote lays it out in black and white. Elites don’t believe that nationalists can be persuaded by propaganda,. They must be eradicated through incarceration or worse. Isn’t that the underlying message of January 6?

The other underlying message of January 6, is that ordinary people are no longer allowed to challenge the authority of the people in power. Again, political legitimacy in the US has always been determined by elections. What January 6 indicates, is that legitimacy no longer matters. What matters is power, and the person who can have you arrested for questioning his authority, has all the power he needs. Check out this excerpt from a post on Substack by political analyst Kurt Nimmo:

“Klaus Schwab, a student of the war criminal Henry Kissinger, is a mentor to power-hungry and narcissistic sociopaths. The WEF “Great Reset” is designed to turn the world into an impoverished social concentration camp, where destitute serfs “own nothing” and this, in true Orwellian fashion, will set them free…

I challenge people to investigate the WEF’s Global Redesign Initiative. According to the Transnational Institute in the Netherlands, this “initiative” proposes

a transition away from intergovernmental decision-making towards a system of multi-stakeholder governance. In other words, by stealth, they are marginalizing a recognized model where we vote in governments who then negotiate treaties which are then ratified by our elected representatives with a model where a self-selected group of ‘stakeholders’ make decisions on our behalf. (Emphasis added.)

In other words, large transnational corporate “stakeholders” will be deciding where you live, what you eat (insects and weeds), how you reproduce (or not reproduce; children produce carbon emissions), and what you can “rent” from them, or not be allowed to rent if you complain about an unelected globalist “economic” cartel driving humanity into serfdom, worldwide poverty, and depopulation.” (“WEF Calls for Destruction of America’s Middle Class“, Kurt Nimmo on Geopolitics)

What Nimmo is saying is that these billionaire elites are now so powerful, that they can openly say they’re going to “transition away from intergovernmental decision-making” (ie– representative government”) to a system of “multi-stakeholder governance.” If I’m not mistaken, that is a pretty unambiguous declaration of a new form of supra-national government, in which only the billionaire stakeholders have a vote in what policies are implemented. But isn’t that the way things work already? On any number of topics from ESG, to digital currencies, to vaccine passports, to AI, to gain-of-function research, to 15-minute cities, to transhumanism, to war with Russia; the decisions are all being made by a handful of people of whom we know every little and who were never voted into office.

And that brings us back to our original question: How many of these oddball events (in recent years) were conjured up and implemented by agents of the deep state to advance the elitist agenda?

This seem like an impossible question since it’s hard to find a link between these dramatically divers events. For example, what is the link between a Drag Queen Children’s Hour and, let’s say, firebombing a food processing plant in Oklahoma? Or the relentless political exploitation of gender issues and the January 6 public show trials? If there was a connection, we’d see it, right?

Not necessarily, because the link might not have anything to do with the incident itself, but instead, with its impact on the people who experience it. In other words, all of these events could be aimed at generating fear, uncertainty, anxiety, alienation and even terror. Have the intelligence agencies launched such destabilizing operations before?

Indeed, they have, many times. Here’s an excerpt from an article that will help you to see where I’m going with this. It’s from a piece at The Saker titled Operation Gladio: NATO’s Secret War for International Fascism.” See if you notice any similarities with the way things have been unfolding in America for the last few years:

Yves Guerin-Serac: the Black Ops Grandmaster behind Operation Gladio…. wrote the basic training and propaganda manuals which can be fairly described as the Gladio order of battle.”…

Guerin-Serac was a war hero, agent provocateur, assassin, bomber, intelligence agent, Messianic Catholic, and the intellectual grandmaster behind the ‘Strategy of Tension’ essential to the success of Operation Gladio. Guerin-Serac published via Aginter Press the Gladio manual, including Our Political Activity in what can aptly be described as Gladio’s First Commandment:

“Our belief is that the first phase of political activity ought to be to create the conditions favoring the installation of chaos in all of the regime’s structures…In our view the first move we should make is to destroy the structure of the democratic state under the cover of Communist and pro-Soviet activities…Moreover, we have people who have infiltrated these groups.”

Guerin-Serac continues:

“Two forms of terrorism can provoke such a situation [breakdown of the state]: blind terrorism (committing massacres indiscriminately which cause a large number of victims), and selective terrorism (eliminate chosen persons)…

This destruction of the state must be carried out under the cover of ‘communist activities.’ After that, we must intervene at the heart of the military, the juridical power and the church, in order to influence popular opinion, suggest a solution, and clearly demonstrate the weakness of the present legal apparatus. Popular opinion must be polarized in such a way, that we are being presented as the only instrument capable of saving the nation.”

Anarchic random violence was to be the solution to bring about such a state of instability thus allowing for a completely new system, a global authoritarian order. Yves Guerin-Serac, who was an open fascist, would not be the first to use false-flag tactics that were blamed on communists and used to justify more stringent police and military control from the state….” (“Operation Gladio: NATO’s Secret War for International Facism”, The Saker)

Repeat: the first phase of political activity ought to be to create the conditions favoring the installation of chaos in all of the regime’s structures… This destruction of the state must be carried out under the cover of (communist) activities…. Popular opinion must be polarized in such a way, that we are being presented as the only instrument capable of saving the nation.”

In other words, the objective of the operation is to completely disrupt all social relations and interaction, cultivate feelings of uncertainty, polarization and terror, find a group that can be scapegoated for the wide societal collapse, and, then, present yourself (elites) as the best choice for restoring order.

Is this what’s going on?

It’s very possible. It could all be part of a Grand Strategy aimed at “wiping the slate clean” in order to “transition away from intergovernmental decision-making” to a system of “multi-stakeholder governance.”

That could explain why there has been such a vicious and sustained attack on our history, culture, traditions, religious beliefs, monuments, heroes, and founders. They want to replace our idealism with feelings of shame, humiliation and guilt. They want to erase our past, our collective values, our heritage, our commitment to personal freedom, and the very idea of America itself. They want to raze everything to the ground and start over. That is their basic Gameplan writ large.

The destruction of the state is being carried out behind the cover of seemingly random events that are spreading chaos, exacerbating political divisions, increasing the incidents of public mayhem, and clearing the way for a violent restructuring of the government.

They can’t build a new world order until the old one is destroyed.

Saturday, February 25, 2023

Raiden Warned About AI Censorship (Video - 4')

   Is it time to wake up?

  Our financial system is on the verge of crashing.

  The elites at Davos are telling us we have until 2030 before their Global Reset. But do we? I don't think so. The system is already breaking down as we speak.

  Russia, and China of course remain roadblocks but for how long? Will the current proxy war turn into a real one?

 Here's another frightening topic to worry about. Could AI be turned against us as described below?  

 It looks like our life is more and more a replay of "Conspiracy Theory" the movie.

 To recap: A wacky conspiracy theorist believes in all kinds of nutty ideas. But among these one is real and he may get killed less he finds out which one. Like him, we are running out of time!

 


Richard Wolff on the decline of the US empire and the denial of the US (Video - 57')

  There is a lot to talk about in this video. I personally do not agree with everything. And still, this is a great basis to understand what is going on right now in the world.


 

The energy transition delusion: inescapable mineral realities (Video - 45')


  In this video, Mark Mills explains in great details why the energy transition as dreamed by Europe will NOT happen. It will not because it cannot. The materials and energy necessary for such a transition are simply not available.

Expert shows AI doesn't want to kill us, it has to. (Video - 18mn)

  Will 2025 be our last year?   Just the fact that the question is legitimate is frightening!    Will we blow ourselves or will the AI give ...