Al Gore Warns: People Having Access To Non-Mainstream Information “Threatens Democracy”

　I definitively should start this post with a Mea Culpa as I perfectly realize the danger I represent for "democracy" the way Al Gore understands the word. 

   This said, I do not believe in the junk science that he fly the world promoting in his private jet. And he can also stick his Hockey stick where you know since this is bogus statistics based on no data whatsoever. 

  The Earth climate is an incredibly complex machinery which as far as we know evolved and behaves like an organism, hence the theory of Gaia - Wikipedia from James Lovelock (Still unproved but a very interesting one nevertheless). CO2 is an infinitesimal trace gas with almost no effect on warming, at least compared to water vapor which accounts for 98% of the warming effect (This is known science.) The real effect of the sun is unknown too (The energy we receive from the Sun varies by a few 10th of a % and still we can see it in statistics. What is the mechanism of transmission? No one knows.) As for clouds, they are likewise very hard for modeling. etc... etc... The more you get into the details the more you realize how little we know. 

  Which is exactly why the science should NOT be discussed. Otherwise you confuse people and the message. They may even learn that if you look at ice cores, it seems that historically, the CO2 curve trails the warming curve. Which in plain English would indicate that warming is causing CO2 to rise not the other way around. Imagine! 

  Clearly this kind of message should be banned. And it will be, have no doubt about it! Facebook and YouTube are already diligently erasing that kind of heretical science. The rest will have to be dealt with sooner than later.       

  Eventually they'll get rid of inconvenient statistics too! Why bother with reality when you know the truth and reality doesn't bend the knee? As Groucho Marx used to say: "Who are you gonna believe? Me of your own lying eyes?"

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Modernity.news,

Al Gore says that people having access to information outside of mainstream media sources is a threat to “democracy” and that social media algorithms “ought to be banned.”

Yes, really.

Gore made the comments during an appearance at the Cop28 climate change hysteria conference in Dubai.

Gore whined that social media had “disrupted the balances that used to exist that made representative democracy work much better.”

The former Vice President said that functioning democracy relied on a “shared base of knowledge that serves as a basis for reasoning together collectively” but that “social media that is dominated by algorithms” upsets this balance.

According to Gore, people are being pulled down “rabbit holes” by algorithms that are “the digital equivalent of AR-15s – they ought to be banned, they really ought to be banned!”

Gore claimed, “It’s an abuse of the public forum” and that people were being sucked into echo chambers.

“If you spend too much time in the echo chamber, what’s weaponized is another form of AI, not artificial intelligence, artificial insanity! I’m serious!” he added.

Apparently, the only echo chamber that should be allowed to exist is Gore’s own rabbit hole, wherein the earth is constantly on the brink of destruction thanks to people not obeying his technocratic mandates.

Perhaps Gore is unhappy at his own misinformation being fact checked by individuals who have access to information not produced by corporate media sources that are friendly to him.

Gore infamously predicted that the north polar ice cap would be “ice free” within 5 to 7 years.

It never happened.

As Thomas Cartenacci documents, Gore has a storied history of making climate change predictions that turn out to be spectacularly wrong.

No wonder he wants to ban dissent.

The Why Behind the EV Push

   I also believe that the EV push is to control people. From mundane and benign like road pricing to far more nefarious purposes like where you can and cannot go.

  The good thing is that it won't happen. It is just not technically possible to transform the world fleet of automobiles into EVs in less than 10 years. To some extent, EVs will remain a luxury in the 2020s. We are already seeing a large percentage of the population moving back away from EVs due to their lack of range and cost. 

  Now of course it all depends on what actually happens next year which will be far more important than what cars we drive.

  Here is my take:

  I fully agree with Andrew Bustamante, (an interview I posted last week) that we are already in WW3! Just not the type of good old wars we used to know. This is a war by proxy. NATO against Russia through Ukraine, The West against Arab countries through Gaza. etc... These wars will expand further although we can expect the protagonists to carefully avoid a direct confrontation. 

  But eventually, a confrontation WILL happen. This is unavoidable. War through trade as the one currently taking place with China are always historically replaced by direct confrontations. My best guess is sometimes later in 2024.

  So what happens then? We will almost immediately enter a war economy with restrictions, rationing and other limitations enabled by electronic means. 

  In such an economy, your QR code and car GPS will take a far more ominous place in your life. And once these are introduced, they'll stay with us forever. (It is much easier to imagine that only EVs are allowed to move in such a world.)

  Here is what I believe was the alternative: Accept the absurd "War to save the planet" and get all these things "light" or refuse them as we did and get them anyway but the reason being a real war. Now of course they would prefer a real war where you do not blow up everything, otherwise what's the point? But how can you be sure of this?

Guest Post by Eric Peters

Why are they pushing EVs so aggressively?

The “climate crisis” stuff is the excuse, of course. But what is the reason? Well, it’s fundamentally the same reason behind the failed push to get everyone “vaccinated” – which was really a push to set a precedent that would inevitably be expanded, as always happens when precedents are set (as for example when the precedent was set that forcing the car companies to install seat belts in cars led to the government forcing people to wear them).

All buckled in for saaaaaaafety!

If the government had been able to establish the precedent that it had the legitimate authority to force everyone to take a drug then it could – and inevitably would – force everyone to take other drugs. And – via this method – exert total control over people’s increasingly defunct right to engage in commerce, move about freely and even freely associate with others. (The latter right has been largely defunct since the “civil rights” legislation of the 1960s set the precedent that people must associate with one another; a subject for another time.)

And how did the government plan to exert this control?

If you remember, it was to be via electronic means. People were to be QR-coded, like bipedal cattle. The code would be stored on the phone they have already succeeded in getting most of us to carry around all the time.

In order to be allowed into a store or restaurant (or to buy food at a supermarket) the bipedal cattle would have had to show their code scanned.

Via this method the government (and its complicit corporate tools) would control the populace more finely than the greatest authoritarian villains in history. No one could do anything (just about) without the government-corporate nexus knowing about it before you were allowed to do it – and thereby controlling whether you were allowed to do.

This brings us to the why of this push to get everyone into an electric vehicle:

If successful, it will achieve what they failed to accomplish with the “vaccines” – and the attendant QR coding of the population.

Your driving will be under their control. You will only be allowed to drive as they say. You will be immediately punished if you don’t. And you will not be allowed to drive anything else.

This brings us to the how.

native advertising

Via the insurance mafia – which has long been in partnership with the government, which it uses to force you to buy what it sells (and thereby can force you to pay whatever it demands that you pay).

Electric vehicles are electronically tethered vehicles – and not just to their power cords. The reason they’re being pushed so hard is because they are so easy to control – remotely. As an example, a Tesla’s range can be increased (or decreased) by Tesla and irrespective of the owner’s wishes. Tesla also sells its own in-house insurance, which “adjusts” what the victim is obliged to pay as the victim drives, according to how he drives. Too fast – and he pays more.

As a matter of technological capability, every aspect of his driving is under Tesla’s control.

All EVs have this capability embedded – as well as being tethered to a power cord, at the other end of which is the government (which has operational control over the grid – and the utilities – that produce and distribute the electricity without which an EV is a very heavy and very expensive paperweight).

This power can – and will be – metered.

Just the same as bread was rationed in the old Soviet Union. You got just as much as the government decided to allow you to buy.

But the citizen of the Soviet Union was never micromanaged to the extent the micromanagers of the technocratic world state have in mind for us.

Key to the success of this operation is the de facto banning of cars that are not electric and cars that are not electronic. That is to say, older cars that do not have the embedded capability to receive “updates” and that cannot be remotely controlled.

But how will this be done?

Via the mafia refusing to “cover” cars that are disconnected.

A report has been making the rounds about this and it ought not to be dismissed as “conspiracy” because it is an elaborating fact. People are being pushed into EVs. Vehicles that aren’t EVs are being pushed off the market. The government has been pushing the embedding of electronica in all new vehicles that is marketed as “assistance” technology – and “technology” that will prevent “impaired” drivers from driving. By which is meant drivers whose “performance” is outside of allowable parameters.

And electric vehicles are tethered vehicles – both via their power cords and via their “connectedness.”

These are the only vehicles the mafia will “cover” – the “coverage” the government says you have to have, else you may not legally drive. Thereby forcing you out of your disconnected, untethered older vehicle and into an EV. A vehicle they control that you’re allowed to use, but only as they say you may – enforced by the tether of “connectedness.”

Now you understand why they’re pushing EVs – and how they intend to push us out of anything that isn’t.

Child Mask Mandates Have No Clear Benefits And Cause Harm, BMJ Review Finds

  They kept telling us "Follow the Science!" all over the world, almost unanimously, although of course there was no science. 

  The real virologists, Dr Malone in the US, Dr Montagnier in France and many, many others were silenced while the ones paid by laboratories were non stop on television.

  That was then. You would think people have learned since? You would be wrong. The next pandemic will prove this although now it will of course be much harder to convince most people. We don't even know the name of the latest variant! 

  But the science about the consequences of the Covid madness is much less kind and starting to show up. A generation of children has been badly damaged, individually, in their ability to learn but more ominously socially, in their ability to live with others.   

  Does it matter? Hard to tell. The social, economic, technological and military problems are piling up so fast that in the end, maybe not!  

  Still, you would believe that elected governments in democratic countries would have the interest of their citizens at heart but that would be very "last century" as a concept. Today's governments are promoted jet-set applicants working on behalf of their corporate sponsors. The wet dream of Mussolini and his fascist colleagues with their vision of the fusion of government and large corporations. 

  They did it, Benito! Although of course the future will look nothing like the futuristic one you were dreaming about. Democracy is messy but free people are happier on their own than even the kindest tyranny can achieve, because they find solutions that the most well intended political systems from communist to fascist never seen to be able to stumble on in their technocratic pursuit of social perfection. And still the machine marches on, ignoring its mistakes, blinded by the light of salvation which always seems to be far ahead at the end of an endless tunnel. Burning bodies to save souls in the Middle Ages, now they are burning souls to save bodies. Is that what we call progress?

Authored by Guy Gin via DailySceptic.org,

A new systematic review has been published in Archives of Disease in Childhood, one of the journals of the British Medical Journal, by Sandlund et al. titled ‘Child mask mandates for COVID-19: a systematic review‘.

Since no randomised controlled trials have even been conducted on child mask-wearing or mask mandates, the authors systematically reviewed observational studies and included 22 in the final analysis: six found child mask mandates were associated with lower rates of infection; the other 16 didn’t.

But the studies that found they didn’t weren’t just greater in quantity; they were higher quality too.

Of the six studies reporting a significant negative correlation between masking and COVID-19 cases, five had critical and one had serious ROB [risk of bias].

Of the 16 studies failing to find a significant correlation, one (6.3%) had critical, 10 (62.5%) had serious, five (31.3%) had moderate and none had low ROB. [emphasis added here and below]

In short, almost all studies with critical ROB had pro-mask results, while all studies with moderate ROB did not.

Table 2 below gives a breakdown of the various types of bias the reviewers found. The six studies with pro-mask results are listed first.

All six studies reporting a negative association were potentially confounded by crucial differences between masked and unmasked groups, including the number of instructional school days, differences in school size, systematic baseline differences in case rates in all phases of the pandemic, testing policies, contact-tracing policy differences and teacher vaccination rates.

Almost all these confounds seem to apply to the worst of the bunch, Jehn et al., who found “the odds of a school-associated COVID-19 outbreak in schools without a mask requirement were 3.5 times higher than those in schools with an early mask requirement”. Unfortunately, this study was so bad even pro-maskers interviewed by the Atlantic said it was embarrassing. Among its many problems was that even though the study period was July 15th to August 31st 2021, “Some [schools] didn’t begin class until August 10th; others were open from July 19th or July 21st. That means students in the latter group of schools had twice as much time — six weeks instead of three weeks — in which to develop a Covid outbreak.” No wonder the researchers didn’t want to share the raw data.

That study was published in the U.S. CDC’s in-house propaganda rag Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, but even prestigious peer-review journals like the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) have published similar rubbish by pro-mask scientists who gerrymandered results through a conveniently selected study design, as Sandlund et al. explain.

The Boston observational study [Cowger et al.] stated they could infer causality between lifting school mask mandates and increases in student and staff cases by using a difference-in-differences technique. However, a subsequent reanalysis called the methodology and results of this study into question and failed to find the same association when expanding the population to include the entire state or using different statistical analysis and also found the initial study’s results were likely confounded by differences in prior infection rates.

Interestingly, whereas as all pro-mask studies with critical risk of bias were done in North America (five in the U.S.; one in Canada), most of the studies with the lowest risk of bias were done in Europe.

In a Spanish study of almost 600 000 children, the researchers did not find a significant difference in cases between unmasked five-year-olds and masked six-year-olds; instead, case rates correlated closely with the age of children, which was also observed in another Spanish study. … A lack of significant association between masking children and risk of COVID-19 was also reported by the U.K. Department of Education. … A Finnish study compared case rates in children with and without mask mandates in 10-12 year-olds, and the authors found no reduction in COVID-19 case rates when mask recommendations were extended to include 10-12 year olds.

All this means that Sandlund et al. come to the inevitable conclusion that “real-world effectiveness of child mask mandates against SARS-CoV-2 transmission or infection has not been demonstrated with high-quality evidence”.

But the issue of child mask mandates isn’t just about mask effectiveness; it’s about potential harms too, such as negative effects on language learning and communication.

Mask wearing causes reduced word identification and impedes the ability to teach and evaluate speech. There is a link between observation of the mouth and language processing, and people of all ages continue to focus on the mouth when listening to non-native speech.

Masks may also have negative psychological effects on children too.

There is also evidence that masks hinder social-emotional learning and language/literacy development in young children. Children with special-education needs and autism may be disproportionately impacted by mask requirements as they rely heavily on facial expressions to pick up social cues. Misinterpretation of facial expressions increases anxiety and depression in individuals. School environments with mask mandates were also found to have increased anxiety levels compared to those without mandates.

Additionally, the physiological effects of masks may be worse for children than adults.

In addition, mask wearing has been associated with physiological harm — many of which are more frequently reported in children than in adults — which may have multiple negative downstream effects, including reduced time and intensity of exercise, additional sick days, reduced learning capacity, and increased anxiety. Masking has also been found to lead to rapid increase in CO2 content in inhaled air — higher in children than in adults — and to levels above acceptable safety standards for healthy adult workers, which may rise further with physical exertion.

This leads to a simple cost-benefit analysis of child mask mandates.

• Costs: potentially language learning and communication issues, worse psychological well-being and negative physiological effects.

• Benefits: None

In conclusion, Sandlund et al. recommend that “Adults who work with children should be educated about the lack of clear benefits and the potential harms of masking children”.

Even though it would be too little too late, it’d be nice if some of the various governments around the world that forced kids to mask followed this recommendation. It’s a shame they won’t.

Tucker Carlson interviewing Alex Jones (Video 15')

 

 The elites are voluntarily crashing our society to take control.  

 Well if he is not right, let's say that what's happening now looks suspiciously like what he is describing. 

 Now as discussing in a previous post, 2030 is still very far away. Before that you have 2024...

Dr. Michael Nehls: The Indoctrinated Brain

 As I have been arguing for 3 years now, there was more to the Covid crisis than meet the eyes.

Dr. Michael Nehls: The Indoctrinated Brain

December 7th, 2023

When you talk to normal people nowadays, do you notice that something has gone very wrong?

Dr. Michael Nehls argues that the Covid operation is actually a mind control program that involves the coordinated use of media and neurotoxic substances against billions of people.

The Indoctrinated Brain: How to Successfully Fend Off the Global Attack on Your Mental Freedom by Michael Nehls MD PhD

I’ve struggled for years to determine the real motivations behind the Covid operation.

Profits, kill off and power… These are all obvious. Of course, it’s all of those, but they seem insufficient when considering the audacity and scale of Covid.

Covid is much bigger than all of these things, which have been going on, quietly, mentioned on little Internet backwaters like Cryptogon for decades.

With Covid, they came for billions of us all at once.

This is planned. This is on purpose. This is not a coincidence.

Are we days away from 3WW? (Video 42')

  Although he tends to be extreme, I like Canadian Preper because he highlights facts which mostly come just under the radar and are ignored by most medias.

  If, as he said today, Friday, Dec 8th, 2023, Netanyahu is indeed planning to let extremist Zionists people storm the Mosque of the Dome in Jerusalem in the coming days, then it's unavoidable, the 3rd World War will start either before the end of the year or soon after.

 This would explain why Putin just went to Saudi Arabia and the Iranian President is in Moscow today. Either you stop this from happening or the gates of hell open soon after. 

 The chances? 50/50 

 But this would change little, the chance to stumble into a World War in 2024 are very close to 100%

 This is not by accident that this blog is called 4th Turning. We have in fact reached a fundamental inflection point. Sometimes in 2024, the Western financial system will explode. The Western elites know this of course and understand that before it happens, the world MUST go into emergency mode and the only way to do this is war. 

 We may have months left or we may have weeks. But the trillions of dollars of debt are all coming home to roost. That part of the story is already in the cards.

 How we play it will be decided in the coming weeks, before the end of the year.

 Prepare yourself, 2024 will be a year to behold!

 

WW3 HAS BEGUN: CIA/ NUCLEAR EXPERT- ANDREW BUSTAMANTE (Video 42')

  Amazing interview! The guy looks and sounds like some kind of later day hippy but articulates a deeper, well thought analysis of current affairs without overstatements which is quite convincing. His point about a 3WW by proxy is especially interesting since this is indeed exactly what we are seeing if you look rationally at what is going on. The interesting corollary of such analysis is that we are less on the edge than people such as his interviewer, the Canadian Preper, would like to believe.  

 He also introduces nuances in a polarized discussion by explaining the ambivalent relations between the Gulf Arabs and Iran which I can confirm are real. I remember a few years ago seeing hundreds of boats crossing the Strait of Hormuz daily taking manufactured goods to Iran and bringing food to Oman and the Emirates showing that Iran is far less isolated than some would like to believe. 

 And these voices of reason and analysis, between media propaganda and internet hysteria is what unfortunately is missing in our world today. Well worth listening to!

 

Rothschild Wants Merger Between Corporations, Governments And AI To “Save Capitalism”

   Ever wondered who really runs the show in the shadow? Behind most Western governments, corporations and the WEF? Why is Israel untouchable? Follow the money!

  All the "saving-the-Earth" nonsense has one goal in sight, consolidating the world structure and their power above all. In the long term, this never works. But they are not aiming at the long term since as Keynes famously said, "In the long term, we're all dead." The next 100 years we'll do for now. And with the help of AI, nothing seems impossible.

 Brandon Smith alt-market.us

By Brandon Smith

If you’re not familiar with a little organization called the “Council For Inclusive Capitalism,” don’t worry, most people have never heard of it. The group was formed at the height of the covid pandemic; as fear instilled by government officials and the media propagated the news feeds, the majority of the public was rather distracted. The CIC is essentially everything that conspiracy theorists have been warning about for years packaged into a single Orwellian entity, complete with dramatic piano music and a mask of humanitarian philanthropy.

The basic root function of the council is to centralize most or all major corporations (corporations with global influence) and join them with governments into a network that places ideology over profit motive. Some people might argue that corporations need to adopt a shared value system instead of simply roaming around like sharks devouring whatever they can sink their teeth into. But who gets to choose the set of values that corporate behemoths follow?

The CIC is a physical body representing the action arm of the ESG concept. It is meant to create incentives and punishments for the business world based on their compliance with the values of globalism and woke socialism, as well as their submission to the climate agenda. I have written about this issue extensively, but my article ‘What Is The “Council For Inclusive Capitalism?” It’s The New World Order’ is probably the best overview of the group and their intentions.

The idea is simple: Bring the majority of corporations into line with the far-left political order. Once this is done, they will force those companies to use their platforms and public exposure to indoctrinate the masses. We have seen this strategy in action over the past several years, with many companies producing a steady stream of products, media content and marketing rife with Diversity, Equity and Inclusion propaganda, not to mention anti-west and anti-conservative propaganda.

These corporations have been so ingrained into the DEI and ESG format that many of them are willing to alienate the majority of their customers and lose vast profits. The last vestiges of free market economics are thus destroyed, because the profit motive has been replaced with a political motive.

Why would companies choose to join with such an organization if they are going to be constantly micromanaged in their operations? It my not be presented to them as a choice, but rather an inevitable requirement. Those who get in on the ground floor get the best seats at the cabal’s table; those who join late might be crushed under the weight of an oppressive socialist bureaucracy.

Then again, the choice could also be voluntary with the promise that corporate leaders will be given extensive governance roles after the “Great Reset” of capitalism which the World Economic Forum discusses so often.

Keep in mind that the only way such companies would be able to survive after being shunned by the majority of the public is if they join with governments, are handed a state sponsored monopoly and are supported by perpetual subsidies. They might even be operating under the assumption that as long as they continue to serve the woke religion they will eventually be rewarded with “too woke to fail” status.

Mussolini once defined the meeting of corporate power with government power as the original design for fascism. The Council for Inclusive Capitalism is the living breathing expression of that authoritarian seed.

The group is headed by Lady Lynn de Rothschild of the notorious Rothschild dynasty, and has expanded to include an army of corporate partners, government partners, UN partners and even the Vatican. A key component to the globalist agenda that is mentioned frequently is Artificial Intelligence (AI), along with its supposed ability to upend everything in our society and economy forever. While the abilities of AI are highly overrated, the elites seem to think it’s some kind of godlike apparatus that will remake the world. Lady Rothschild engaged with the media recently to promote an interesting and revealing argument:

Surprisingly, Rothschild meets some resistance from her interviewers which forces her to make an indirect admission: AI will require a “root and branch reform of the economy,” meaning, free markets have to go and government/corporate partners will have to step in to control everything, for the sake of the populace and the “greater good”, of course. Except it’s all a sham.

AI, much like climate change, is quickly becoming yet another fabricated excuse for global centralization. The CIC along with institutions like the WEF and the UN have been asserting for the past few years that “someone” needs to step in to moderate AI so that no single government abuses its apparently unlimited power. In other words: Problem, Reaction, Solution.

The globalists create a problem out of thin air (AI), then suggest it is a much greater boon (or threat) to humanity than it actually is, then they offer their services as fair and benevolent arbiters of the technology and its effects. Rothschild suggests it herself in the interview when she claims that “capitalists” will have to adjust their priorities over to social causes in the wake of AI. As I stated before, it’s just ESG in another form.

I would point out the tone of disdain in Rothschild’s reaction when free markets are brought into the debate. These people HATE any notion of free markets. Adam Smith’s system was drafted in direct response to the trespasses of mercantilist control. The two constructs are mutually exclusive. You cannot have free markets (or freedom) within a centralized mercantilist empire. You cannot have free markets and socialism within the same economy. And to be clear, the system we have in the US today is NOT a free market system, it is former free market system slowly undermined over time.

Free markets are already fair. Corporate elites interfere with that fairness when they join with governments to rig the system in their favor and gain undue advantages. The inequities Rothschild describes as an excuse for centralization were in fact created by elites like her. The CIC and the Great Reset agenda are nothing more than tools to entrench corporate and elitist power forever.

They get to decide which companies thrive or die. They get to decide the social values of the next century. They get to dictate how the worlds resources are utilized and who is allowed access to them. And, governments will ensure that they are protected from the rage of the people should the public become wise to their hostile takeover.

The most insulting part? Anyone who criticizes or attacks this ideological invasion of our economic life will be accused of being a monster. After all, the CIC just wants to save humanity from itself, right? If you want to stop them, you must be some kind of selfish villain that values individual freedom over the common good.

The bigger question that the globalists don’t want us to ask, though, is what makes them qualified to determine the common good? Why is is assumed that they should be the arbiters of everything? Even the stagflation crisis we are facing today is a direct result of governments and central banks stepping in with trillions in fiat money to save the “too big to fail” corporations from their own disastrous practices. Why should we trust them with our social welfare, or anything else for that matter?

The globalists will respond to this argument with AI. They will say that AI is the ultimate “objective” mediator because it has no emotional or political loyalties. They will assert that AI must become the de facto decision making apparatus for human civilization. And now you see why Rothschild is so anxious to spearhead the creation of a global regulatory framework for AI – Whoever controls the functions of AI, whoever programs the software, eventually controls the world, all while using AI as a proxy. If anything goes wrong, they can simply say that it was AI that made the decision, not them.

It is the perfect shadow government; a technocratic Wizard of OZ using the smoke and mirrors of an AI puppet to rule the planet, removing all accountability and displacing all rebellion. For how can the populace argue with or revolt against a faceless algorithm floating in the digital ether?

New Zealand: Important Medical Staff Were Granted Covid Vaccine Exemptions

  This tells you all you need to know about the vaccine but also about our society. If you are part of the new nobility, you have a choice. For the others, Do as we tell you or lose your job. 

 The amazing fact is that most people still bother voting or listening to the news. 

I’ve been running Cryptogon for over two decades and this is up there with the worst frauds I’ve ever encountered.

Via: Hatchard Report:

The criteria for granting exemptions apparently entailed an assessment concerning how vital staff were to the working of the health service. In other words, senior figures and those holding key surgical positions could actually insist they remain unvaccinated and continue to be allowed to work. Whilst unvaccinated nurses for example could not gain exemptions and lost their positions.

If senior staff who wished to remain unvaccinated had spoken out publicly, the issue of Covid vaccine safety might have been given a public airing. Instead the Ministry of Health and the government kept a lid on all and any discussion. It did so through liaison with mainstream and social media outlets to censor content and through tight control of staff.

List of cancelled Posts - A short History of censorship

 I started this blog in March 2019. The good old days of the Internet, pre-Covid when nothing was cancelled and sure enough all my post of 2019 are still accessible.  

The 1st post I cannot access is dated Jul 14, 2019. A video about the Japanese Model. OK, not cancelled considering the subject, the video was probably erased.

The second one if also a video on YouTube by Elon Musk about the risk of AI in January of 2021. Which means that all my controversial articles and videos about Covid-19 during the year 2020 are still accessible. 

Then we find an interesting article about Oligarchy in America later in January 2021.

The next one is in March 2021, titled Was Covid a Bio-weapon? (95% probability but not yet so clear then.)

Then an article from Dough Casey in May 2021 on How the Covid lock-downs will become Climate lock-downs. (We are definitively heading in that direction! COP-28?)

Then in Sep 2021, an Article called Covid Vaccine Dystopia, a Manifesto. (We are now slowly, very slowly discovering that the vaccines may have killed more people than the virus.)

Then an article in Dec 2021 When Idiocy becomes Hardwired. OK.

Jan 2022, 3D, the future of advertising. A fluke I guess. 

Apr 2022, The end of Progress.

Jun 2022, Earth most dangerous Website, The Story of Wikileaks. (A YouTube Video - Unknown at that time but soon YouTube videos are going to disappear faster and faster, but not yet in early 2022. Tells you how fast this all went)

Aug 2022, Covid Vaccine Propaganda Busted. High deaths and Cancers. (Now we're starting to see more and more articles on this subject... But in 2022 it's definitively a no-no subject.)

Dec 2022, Fascism in the EU. (No comments)

Feb 2023, Death jumped 8.9% in Japan in 2022. (Interesting. So it's not just Covid misinformation which is cancelled. Inconvenient statistics, even without mentioning Covid or the Vaccines are also erased!)

Mar 2023, Douglas Macgregor, Ukraine is crumbling under the Russian Offensive. (He was of course right but by the beginning of 2023, YouTube has moved from erasing misinformation about vaccines to censoring unapproved information about Ukraine. This of course is pure censorship! Oh slippery slope!)

Aug 2023, A story that will change your mind forever by Dr David Martin. (In August this year you were not yet permitted to voice doubts about the vaccines.)

Sep 2023, Don't Dismiss the Possibility of Gold Confiscation. (Should we really NOT talk about gold? Still not talking about it now that it's approaching 2100 USD per Once.)

Sep 2023, Tucker Carlson Video, "I'm exposing what they are planning!" (No don't please!)

Nov 2023, Tucker Carlson Video,The Interview of Martin Shkreli (This was truly an amazing video and I can easily understand why this would be cancelled. You do not want people to think too much about certain things. If you can find it somewhere else, it is worth listening to.)

So with this personal sample, you can see how over the last 4 years we moved from zero censorship, to limited censorship about Covid "misinformation" in 2022 to finally a more broad censorship about diverse social subject.

On this trajectory, it is not very hard to guess that even more subjects will be censored in 2024, until finally we enter either in 2025 or 2026 a regime of broad automatic censorship of almost everything including political critique as the EU wants to put in place. 

In the end, China  was only a few years early in 2020 (as I warned about then). By 2030, we will all be living in a Chinese type of society with the same very limited political freedom and far less economic freedom in Europe.

This of course presuppose that our society can survive in its current state until 2030. A tall order!